BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! We’ve been nominated, and we’d love your vote!

We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

doubt SC A 3

Expert replies
by aditya8062 » Fri Nov 27, 2015 3:09 am
sentence 1: scientists discovered irrefutable evidence that mars was once covered with water, disproving the hypothesis that the planet has always been dry

Doubt: i feel that this sentence must be WRONG as comma + VERBing is MODIFYING the previous clause "mars was once covered with water" , a situation which is NOT really happening . in actuality "scientists" must be "disproving the hypothesis"

thanks and best regards
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Nov 27, 2015 3:27 am
Please post the entire SC, along with the answer choices.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by aditya8062 » Fri Nov 27, 2015 3:36 am
Good Day Guru

Guru this sentence is not from any SC ;i am really sorry but i came across this sentence while doing the following problem:

Scientists have found signs that moving water changed the chemical makeup of the surface of Mars in recent eras, therefore concluding that its crust is harboring up to three times as much water than was previously thought.

(A) eras, therefore concluding that its crust is harboring up to three times as much water than was
(B) eras, therefore concluding that the planet's crust harbors up to three times as much water or more as was
(C) eras and have therefore concluded that the planet's crust harbors up to three times as much water as
(D) eras and they have concluded, therefore, that its crust harbors up to three times as much water, or more, than
(E) eras and concluded, therefore, that the planet's crust is harboring up to three times more water as was

please note that in this problem i eliminated A and B because "therefore concluding" is modifying "moving water changed the chemical makeup of the surface of Mars in recent eras" -----> which is wrong .Kindly tell me whether same logic can be extended to SENTENCE 1?

thanks and best regards
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Nov 27, 2015 2:26 pm
aditya8062 wrote:Good Day Guru

Guru this sentence is not from any SC ;i am really sorry but i came across this sentence while doing the following problem:

Scientists have found signs that moving water changed the chemical makeup of the surface of Mars in recent eras, therefore concluding that its crust is harboring up to three times as much water than was previously thought.

(A) eras, therefore concluding that its crust is harboring up to three times as much water than was
(B) eras, therefore concluding that the planet's crust harbors up to three times as much water or more as was
(C) eras and have therefore concluded that the planet's crust harbors up to three times as much water as
(D) eras and they have concluded, therefore, that its crust harbors up to three times as much water, or more, than
(E) eras and concluded, therefore, that the planet's crust is harboring up to three times more water as was

please note that in this problem i eliminated A and B because "therefore concluding" is modifying "moving water changed the chemical makeup of the surface of Mars in recent eras" -----> which is wrong .Kindly tell me whether same logic can be extended to SENTENCE 1?

thanks and best regards
This line of reasoning is sound.
In both your sentence and the official sentence, the agent of COMMA + concluding should be the implied subject of the preceding that-clause.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by vishalwin » Sat Nov 28, 2015 8:31 am
Hi Mitch,


I have a doubt in comma + VERB-ing.

Till now I knew that comma + VERB-ing refers to clause....like part before comma + VERB-ing is CAUSE and part after comma + VERB-ing is action.

The volcano erupted, blotting out the sun.



This is new for me that comma + VERB-ing can refer to a subject/ word in previous sentence.


Also, can you please help me in understanding the usage of (, + including) in sentence.


does comma + INCLUDing refers to a noun in sentence or the complete clause.
Thanks & Regards
vishalwin
------------------------------------
GMAT Score - 530
I will BEAT the GMAT!
Join the discussion

by aditya8062 » Sat Nov 28, 2015 9:22 am
Till now I knew that comma + VERB-ing refers to clause....like part before comma + VERB-ing is CAUSE and part after comma + VERB-ing is action.
yes it does. in fact in one my posts Guru has explained it very nicely. give me some time i will attach that post here

Also, can you please help me in understanding the usage of (, + including) in sentence.


does comma + INCLUDing refers to a noun in sentence or the complete clause.
COMMA +INCLUDING is an exception to COMMA + VERBING. it is not used to describe the previous CLAUSE BUT it describes the LIST mentioned before the comma
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Nov 28, 2015 2:23 pm
vishalwin wrote:Hi Mitch,

I have a doubt in comma + VERB-ing.

Till now I knew that comma + VERB-ing refers to clause....like part before comma + VERB-ing is CAUSE and part after comma + VERB-ing is action.

The volcano erupted, blotting out the sun.

This is new for me that comma + VERB-ing can refer to a subject/ word in previous sentence.
Check my post here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ing-verb-mod ... 14885.html
Also, can you please help me in understanding the usage of (, + including) in sentence.

does comma + INCLUDing refers to a noun in sentence or the complete clause.
Check my post here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/seamus-heaney-t283948.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1