BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Doubt in 2 options

Expert replies
by anshulagarwal12 » Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:57 pm
Question : Many Americans cities have been unsuccessful in their efforts to move mental patients out of mammoth asylums and that treat them in their local communities

a. to move mental patients out of mammoth asylums and treat
b. to move mental patients out of mammoth asylums for treating

Here, I think b is perfect choice as I dont feel that move and treat are two different works.

Kindly suggest where I am wrong.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by kartikshah » Fri Jul 20, 2012 2:09 pm
The problem here is parallelism which is solved in option A
to move patients from X and (to) treat them in Y.
Join the discussion

by anshulagarwal12 » Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:32 pm
Hi Kartik,

But dont u think they both are not independent things?

They want to move patients for treating ONLY? to show this we dont need "and"

Please explain briefly.
Join the discussion

by kartikshah » Thu Aug 02, 2012 3:17 am
anshulagarwal12 wrote:Hi Kartik,

But dont u think they both are not independent things?

They want to move patients for treating ONLY? to show this we dont need "and"

Please explain briefly.
Hi,

We must be careful to avoid answer choices that change the meaning of the sentence. Option B tells us that patients are being moved so that they can be treated in local communities. In order to preserve the meaning of the original sentence, it would be best to choose A over B.
Join the discussion

by anshulagarwal12 » Thu Aug 02, 2012 6:24 pm
Hi Katik,

Yeah this what I believe is the correct logical meaning.

Why they want to move mental patients out of asylums? for treating them in the local communities. So it is more meaningful than A.
Join the discussion

by kartikshah » Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:10 pm
anshulagarwal12 wrote:Hi Katik,

Yeah this what I believe is the correct logical meaning.

Why they want to move mental patients out of asylums? for treating them in the local communities. So it is more meaningful than A.
Not necessarily. The sentence does not tell us that the patients were moved so that they could be treated in local communities. The sentence simply says that American cities are unsuccessful at two things: (1) moving patients out of large asylums, and (2) treating them in local communities.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1