BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

doubt CR 2

Expert replies
by aditya8062 » Thu Dec 04, 2014 6:03 am
Iridium, a hard, whitish metal similar to platinum, is extremely rare on Earth. Extremely high concentrations of iridium on Earth result
from only two scenarios: massive volcanic eruptions that release iridium from deep within the Earth and meteorites that shower down on Earth from space. When scientists found concentrations of iridium 30 times higher than normal in rock stratum from 65 million years
ago, they concluded that a massive meteor or comet hit the Earth and caused the massive extinction of the dinosaurs.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the scientist's conclusion?

A. Volcanoes massive enough to generate high concentrations of iridium are very rare.
B. Massive volcanic eruptions occurred frequently 80 million years ago.
C. Most scientists support the hypothesis that a cosmic impact wiped out the dinosaurs.
D. The massive extinction that occurred 70 million years ago killed not only the dinosaurs but also 70 percent of all life on Earth.
E. A comet struck the earth some 120 million years ago, but no widespread extinction occurred.

my concern: i selected A in this question.if we take A as correct then out of the 2 theories mentioned only "meteorites theory" seems to have occurred,thereby implying that the high concentration must have occurred as hypothesized by the scientists and hence we can conclude that a massive meteor or comet hit the Earth and caused the massive extinction of the dinosaurs.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by MartyMurray » Thu Dec 04, 2014 9:05 am
This question does not seem that tight.

They seem to be implying that B is the right answer because massive volcanic eruptions were common before the mass extinction, so something else must have caused it. The thing is, we are looking at 15 million years between those massive eruptions and the formation of the rock strata. That makes the connection between the eruptions and the situation 65 million years ago difficult to assess at best.

Regarding answer A, really that is irrelevant. Incidents of comets hitting the earth are rare also, if you think about it. So rarity of occurrence is not an indication one way or the other.

Still, the question is not tight, and so your choosing any answer that seems half logical is not surprising.
Join the discussion

by mbawisdom » Sun Dec 21, 2014 8:58 am
I think (A) supports the proposition the most out of the possible answers.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Mon Dec 22, 2014 7:18 pm
Hi aditya8062,

What is the source of this question? I only ask because it doesn't "feel" like an official GMAT question. Since the prompt focuses on timeline-based data, we're expected to infer a number of things involving the timeline that aren't really inferable. I wouldn't expect to see a prompt phrased this way on Test Day.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by aditya8062 » Mon Dec 22, 2014 7:41 pm
hi Rich
this question is from LSAT question papers there are books which publish old LSAT questions . i think it is from year 2002,though not sure about the year. i will attach the pdf of the book if possible
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:00 pm
Hi aditya8062,

I know that there's something of a debate about this issue, but I've never been a fan of using LSAT practice questions to prepare for the GMAT. Beyond the obvious reason (it's a different Test written by different people), LSAT LR includes variations that GMAT CR does not, includes question types and wrong answer types that the GMAT does not, does not offer question difficulty in the same ratio as the Official GMAT, etc. There are plenty of sources for GMAT practice materials, so unless you're planning on taking the LSAT, I'd suggest that you focus on GMAT sources and stop spending your time and energy on LSAT material.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by aditya8062 » Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:08 pm
i agree with you
Join the discussion