BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

doubt 13

Expert replies
by aditya8062 » Mon Sep 29, 2014 3:44 am
Industrialization and modern methods of insect control have improved the standard of living around the globe while at the same time they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having gone virtually unregulated since they were developed more than 50 years ago.
a) while at the same time they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having
b) while at the same time introducing some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants that have
c) while they have introduced 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants at the same time, and have
d) but introducing some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants at the same time that have
e) but at the same time introduce some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having

my concern: i am concerned about choice A. what is preventing me to consider the construction "comma+having" as adverbial in nature? if i think it as adverbial then this construction can modify the previous clause "they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants", where "they" refers to "Industrialization and modern methods" so the sentence would turn out some thing like this ----> "Industrialization and modern methods have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having gone virtually unregulated since they were developed more than 50 years ago------>the adverbial expression "having gone virtually unregulated since they were developed more than 50 years ago" explaining WHY "Industrialization and modern methods have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants"

i presume that adverbial expression can explain WHY, HOW , WHEN, WHERE

also i will appreciate if i can get some insight on usage of "HAVING" in the construction such as construction 1: "comma+ having" after the main clause; example: MAIN CLAUSE, having ........
construction 2: having, MAIN CLAUSE....
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Uva@90 » Mon Sep 29, 2014 5:48 am
Hi Experts,

Please explain me how come B is correct ?

In option B, does the usage of 'THAT' Correct ? As per the sentence 'THAT' modifes 'CHEMICAL POLLUTANTS' which wrong right ? Instead it should modify 'Industrialization and modern methods'.

If Is miss some thing please clarify me.

Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Uva.
Known is a drop Unknown is an Ocean
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Sep 30, 2014 3:21 am
aditya8062 wrote: i will appreciate if i can get some insight on usage of "HAVING" in the construction such as construction 1: "comma+ having" after the main clause; example: MAIN CLAUSE, having ........
construction 2: having, MAIN CLAUSE....
If they serves to refer to industrialization and modern methods, we get the following:
Industrialization and modern methods were developed more than 50 years ago.
Since industrialization is the DEVELOPMENT of industry, it is redundant to say that INDUSTRIALIZATION was DEVELOPED.
Further, it seems contradictory to say that MODERN methods were developed MORE THAN 50 YEARS AGO.

Also:
On the GMAT, MAIN CLAUSE + COMMA + having + VERBed is almost always WRONG.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by aditya8062 » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:24 am
thanks Guru
On the GMAT, MAIN CLAUSE + COMMA + having + VERBed is always WRONG.
Guru i remember in that post u had said that NOUN + HAVING VERBED is always wrong . but your above quoted construction is different from the thing that u had told me on that post

ALSO please tell me that in this official SC: Some patients who do not respond therapies of depression may simply have received inadequate treatment, having, for example, been prescribed a drug as a dosage too low to be effective or having been taken off a drug too soon. ---->the construction "main clause+ having + verbed" is used as correct

please clarify me if i am missing something
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:51 am
aditya8062 wrote:thanks Guru
On the GMAT, MAIN CLAUSE + COMMA + having + VERBed is always WRONG.
Guru i remember in that post u had said that NOUN + HAVING VERBED is always wrong . but your above quoted construction is different from the thing that u had told me on that post

ALSO please tell me that in this official SC: Some patients who do not respond therapies of depression may simply have received inadequate treatment, having, for example, been prescribed a drug as a dosage too low to be effective or having been taken off a drug too soon. ---->the construction "main clause+ having + verbed" is used as correct

please clarify me if i am missing something
Some patients who do not respond therapies of depression may simply have received inadequate treatment, having, for example, been prescribed a drug at a dosage too low to be effective or having been taken off a drug too soon.
Good catch.
The OA above is an exception.
In my post above, I've qualified my warning regarding COMMA + having + VERBed:
On the GMAT, MAIN CLAUSE + comma + having + VERBed is ALMOST always wrong.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by aditya8062 » Tue Sep 30, 2014 9:03 am
Since industrialization is the DEVELOPMENT of industry, it is redundant to say that INDUSTRIALIZATION was DEVELOPED.
Further, it seems contradictory to say that MODERN methods were developed MORE THAN 50 YEARS AGO.
This is ingenious and very convincing too. No one in any forum has thought like this.i wonder why i am not able to think like this !! honestly, under timed situation, i might miss this subtle difference

following is my conclusion about 2 constructions
1) NOUN + HAVING VERBED ----> always wrong because "having verbed" can modify ACTION and NOT a NOUN

2) main clause + comma + having + verbed ----> almost always wrong because "having+ verbed" serves to modify an action that happened before the main clause hence MUST APPEAR before the main clause

GURU kindly tell me if my conclusions about these two constructions are right

thanks and regards
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1