BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Dont agree

Expert replies
by mchammer » Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:25 am
Hi mates i am new to the forum so a big hello.

i dont agree with the oa of the question below


Insect infestation is a danger for households in which certain standards of cleanliness are not maintained. So that householders are able to detect such infestations before they become serious enough to pose a danger, the county sanitation board has mailed a newsletter to all residents of the county, listing those signs that indicate the beginnings of an insect infestation and encouraging householders to check for such signs.

Which of the following, if true, is the best criticism of the newsletter as a means of achieving the sanitation department's goals?


a) Many insect infestations have certain characteristics that cannot be detected by the investigation of a householder.

b) Once an insect infestation is known to exist, the steps taken to eliminate such an infestation vary according to the species of insect and the locale of the infestation.

c) The newsletter was sent to all residents of the county, including those who maintain the standards of cleanliness that preclude the possibility of insect infestation.

d) Insect infestation is more common in single-family homes than it is in apartments.

e) People who do not maintain minimal standards of cleanliness are unlikely to inspect their homes for the signs of early insect infestation
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by krisraam » Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:01 am
IMO C.

Whats the OA?

Thanks
Raama
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:05 am
i like E.

A. many cannot be detected=>some can be detected, doesnt make the newsletter a failure or useless.

B. elimination of insect infectation is out of scope. households only have to be able to detect.

C. doesnt affect the argument.

D. single homes/apartments out of scope

E. correct IMO. if those people are anyway unlikely to detect infestation, the newsletter would serve no purpose.
Join the discussion

by krisraam » Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:23 am
scoobydooby wrote:i like E.

A. many cannot be detected=>some can be detected, doesnt make the newsletter a failure or useless.

B. elimination of insect infectation is out of scope. households only have to be able to detect.

C. doesnt affect the argument.

D. single homes/apartments out of scope

E. correct IMO. if those people are anyway unlikely to detect infestation, the newsletter would serve no purpose.
Initially I was thinking of E. But it doesn't give the clue that they sent the letter as a means of achieving the sanitation department's goals.

Actually I am not convinced with C either.

Thanks
Raama
Join the discussion

by mchammer » Thu Apr 16, 2009 12:51 pm
OA is E. But i was thinking that A would be eaqually good. but i guess E is the best
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Fri May 13, 2016 11:44 pm
I'd say E but I'm afraid more because of my intuition than any logic.
Join the discussion