BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Dole County

Expert replies
by metallicafan » Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:10 pm
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County found that, of the severely injured drivers and front-seat passengers, 80 percent were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents. This indicates that, by wearing seat belts, drivers and front-seat passengers can greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured if they are in an auto accident.
The conclusion above is not properly drawn unless which of the following is true?

(A) Of all the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey, more than 20 percent were wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(B) Considerably more than 20 percent of drivers and front-seat passengers in Dole County always wear seat belts when traveling by car.
(C) More drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey than rear-seat passengers were very severely injured.
(D) More than half of the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(E) Most of the auto accidents reported to police in Dole County do not involve any serious injury.

OA: _A_
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by killer1387 » Sun Apr 01, 2012 5:08 pm
A goes the best
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Sun Apr 01, 2012 8:13 pm
Premise: 80% of severe front-seat injuries were not wearing seatbelts at the time of the accidents.
Conclusion: Wearing seat belts greatly reduces the risk of severe front-seat injuries.

A. If more than 20% were wearing seatbelts, then they had fewer severe injuries than you would expect based on population. Let's use 30% as a figure to see what I mean:

30% seatbelts = 20% injuries
70% no seatbelts = 80% injuries

We can see that seatbelt use leads to a smaller percentage of severe injuries than would be otherwise expected.

B. We only care about seatbelt use at the time of the accident.

C. Rear-seat passengers are irrelevant.

D. We only care about accidents that resulted in severe injuries.

E. As in D, accidents without serious injuries are not part of the argument.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Mon Apr 02, 2012 5:54 am
This is hardest question and I do not think it is from gmatprep or og books

I meet this question many times and each time I can not do it.

the following is the only way we can understand this question.

make a tale

LAP SEATBELT KHONG LAP SEATBELT
SEVERE 2 8 10

NOT SEVERE >20
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Mon Apr 02, 2012 6:02 am
SORY, I post again.

make a table like this

SEATBELT NO SEATBELT

SEVERE 2 8 10 (total severely injured)
NOT SEVERE
>20 (total seatbelt) 100 (total)

supose there are total 100, and 10 of them are severely injured.

above table is the only way which make you understand the problem

This question is similar to a math question but much harder. I never think gmat will offer this hard question. experts, members, pls, comment.
Join the discussion