BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Dogs

Expert replies
by crackthetest » Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:35 pm
Most large dogs are gentle, but most large dogs scare people. In addition, all dogs who scare people are reliable protectors.

Which can be logically concluded from above?

a) Most dogs that are reliable protectors are gentle.
b) Some gentle dogs are reliable protectors.
c) All dogs that are reliable protectors are large dogs.
d) Some dogs that are not gentle scare people.
e) All large dogs are reliable protectors.

Can you let me know the reason behind your answer choice. OA will follow.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ershovici » Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:07 am
IMO B
A - we don't know what proportion of dogs that are reliable protectors are gentle.
B - we know that a portion of relaible protectors are large dogs, and most of them are gentle
C - not all but most large dogs are protectors
D - we don't know about small dogs, wether they are gentle and scary people
E - the same as C
Join the discussion

by delhiboy1979 » Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:31 am
I think it is A.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:56 am
The answer must be B. When you have two majoritys overlapping (two "mosts"), there is always at least one object that has those two traits. Here, this mean that there is at least one (ie, some) large dogs that are both gentle and scare people. The second sentence tells us all scary dogs are reliable protectors. Therefore, there must be some large, gentle, scary dogs that are reliable protectors. While B is under-comprehensive (ie, it does not say everything that we know must be true), it still must be true given the above deduction.

In inference questions, you should look for duplicated terms, arrive at a deduction, and aggressively scan the answer choices for a choice that matches your deduction.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Tue Oct 20, 2009 8:51 pm
Hi crackthetest,

I hope that helps answer your question.

I should add that this does not at all sound like a question that would actually show up on the GMAT. While there is only one truly and demonstrably correct answer, this sounds way more like a mock LSAT question, one that is trying to test LSAT subtleties of formal logic conventions (some vs all; negating/reversing, etc.) In the OG, the test-maker explicitly states that the GMAT CR section does NOT test "formal logic conventions." And, have you ever seen a question like this in the OG?

My advice is to be careful to study only GMAT questions and, if you need extra practice, questions from a legitimate source (major test prep company).
Join the discussion

by Ludacrispat26 » Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:06 pm
lol, this is a sample problem in PowerScore's Free CR Bible Chapter (page 14):

https://powerscore.com/newmedia/GMAT-Cri ... pter-2.pdf

OA is B
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:24 pm
Hi Ludacrispat26,

I would respond that just because it is called a "bible" does not make it the gospel truth!
Join the discussion

ans

by crackthetest » Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:05 pm
Yes that was from a GMAT source as stated above.

and OA is B. Though I have to agree I haven't seen such a question in any other GMAT books I referred, this question stood at me. I'm trying to think if this can be worked through logical comparison. ( ex: A -> ~B )
but since it has most/some/all I couldn't arrive at such scenarios and wondered if I could bounce this with some here. Thanks for all your explanations.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Wed Oct 21, 2009 7:09 pm
To be clear, what is meant by official GMAT source is questions from the actual test-maker, such as those that come from the OG, and those that come from the official GMAT Prep tests. Because Powerscore is not the test-maker, it is not a "GMAT source". Instead, it is a GMAT-like source.
Join the discussion