BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Dobson

Expert replies
by YellowSapphire » Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:45 am
Source: VeritasPrep [800score]

Dobson: Some historians claim that the people who built a ring of stones thousands of years ago in Britain were knowledgeable about celestial events. The grounds for this claim are that two of the stones determine a line pointing directly to the position of the sun at sunrise at the spring equinox. However, there are many stones in the ring so the chance that one pair will point in a celestially significant direction is high. Therefore, the people who built the ring were not knowledgeable about celestial events.

Which one of the following is an error of reasoning in Dobson's argument?

A. The failure of cited evidence to establish a statement is taken as evidence that that statement is false. *
B. Dobson's conclusion logically contradicts some of the evidence presented in support of it.
C. Statements that absolutely establish Dobson's conclusion are treated as if they merely give some support to that conclusion.
D. Something that is merely a matter of opinion is treated as if it were subject to verification as a fact.
E. Dobson is not a scientist.
Yellow Sapphire
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by captcha » Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:41 am
IMO A

A historians claim rests on a weak argument, but Dobson says because the argument is weak, so its opposite is true, which is the error in dobson's reasoning
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:51 am
A. The failure of cited evidence to establish a statement is taken as evidence that that statement is false. *

A is correct because Dobson says that the likelihood that a pair of stones point in the dir. of the sun is high and inspite of the uncertainty that still prevails,Dobson concludes that the Historians' claims are false.
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:54 am
But i am still pondering over what is cited evidence referring to.Is it the evidence cited by the Historians to support their claims .Or the probaility that a pair of stones happen to point toward the Sun.After rereading and re-re reading it.I feel it refers to the statement Dobsom makes to support his conc.
Join the discussion

by Target2009 » Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:19 pm
+1 to A
Join the discussion