BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Distance

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 11:21 am
Thanked: 1 times
by gmattester » Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:21 am
The figure above shows the number of meters in the lengths of the four sides of a jogging path. What is the total distance around the path? [See Attachement]
(1) One of the sides of the path is 120 meters long.
(2) One of the sides of the path is twice as long as each of the two shortest sides.
Attachments
Doc1.doc
(23.5 KiB) Downloaded 124 times
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Problem Solving |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:15 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 7 times

by anju » Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:35 am
is it 420 mt?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 12:56 am
Thanked: 1 times

by s_kaks » Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:24 pm
Yes.. the Ans seems to be 420 m
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 11:21 am
Thanked: 1 times

by gmattester » Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:14 pm
I am sorry, this is DS question, not PS.
By mistake I posted here.
BTW which one is sufficient to answer this question
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:15 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 7 times

by anju » Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:21 pm
gmattester wrote:I am sorry, this is DS question, not PS.
By mistake I posted here.
BTW which one is sufficient to answer this question
I guessed so.
B - stmt 2 is sufficient since 2x = x+60; 2x cannot be equal to 3x, the only side remaining is x+60
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 146 times

by parallel_chase » Fri Aug 22, 2008 2:25 pm
I think the answer should be B.

Statement I

120 can be any of the three sides. Therefore Insufficient.

Statement II

one side is twice the other two shorter sides.

3x = 2x
or
x+60 = 2x

3x cannot be equal to 2x for any positive integer. Therefore x+60 =2x

x=60

Sufficient.

Hence B.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 11:21 am
Thanked: 1 times

by gmattester » Fri Aug 22, 2008 2:49 pm
parallel_chase wrote:I think the answer should be B.

Statement I

120 can be any of the three sides. Therefore Insufficient.

Statement II

one side is twice the other two shorter sides.

3x = 2x
or
x+60 = 2x

3x cannot be equal to 2x for any positive integer. Therefore x+60 =2x

x=60

Sufficient.

Hence B.
Great.......
Thanks for explanation.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1