BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Diseases

Expert replies
by nileshdalvi » Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:18 pm
Diseases have always plagued the earth's living
organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers
of plant and animal diseases have developed
and been eradicated naturally over time.
This ongoing emergence and disappearance of
diseases is ignored by those who blame the
widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon
man's alteration of naturally occurring substances
to, for instance, produce bigger and
better food sources. For example, some claim
that the use of hormones to increase meat
production heightens the risk of cancer in
people who eat meat. People who hold this
view need to accept the fact that even if cancer
was not such a prevalent disease, another
disease would have arisen naturally to take its
place.
Which one of the following identifies a flaw in
the passage's reasoning?
(A) The writer wrongly assumes that the use
of hormones in meat production never
has an effect upon people who eat meat.
(B) The writer ignores the fact that scientists
are developing cures for some types of
cancer.
(C) The writer does not consider the fact that
a number of diseases have not yet been
discovered.
(D) While the writer identifies a group that
believes cancer is caused by man's interference
with natural forms of food production,
he does not identify or recognize
scientists who disagree with this contention.
(E) The author does not acknowledge that
man's alteration of naturally occurring
substances might trigger the emergence
of new diseases.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by cans » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:24 pm
IMO E
A) Author doesn't assume this...
B) cure is irrelevant
E) as author says many diseases have developed and been eradicated. But what if they have been developed by men's interference?
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:30 am
between D and E
Join the discussion

by nileshdalvi » Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:33 am
You are right Cans
Join the discussion

by sl750 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:00 am
Lol. I thought this was a reading passage

I pick E

The argument talks about naturally occurring diseases and its disappearance. However, the author fails to note that by altering naturally occurring substances, man could create new diseases artificially as opposed to naturally

A - The author doesn't assume this at all
B - We are not interested in the development of cures for cancer
C - Irrelevant
D - No information given of people who oppose this view
Join the discussion