As per title. I did 4 simulations on the official prep software, 3 on tests 1, the last one on test 2 which I wanted to keep untouched until the end. Scores were 690, 710, 710 and 720 but today huge disappointment, a bad 660 which barely makes me top 20%, when I was thinking I had the top 10% in the bag.
The London Pearson Vue centre had a major technical problem that, let alone forcing those that should have taken the exam early in the morning to basically forfeit it, made me start 2 hours late. I was irritated by it, but I guess that after the two essays I was just hindered by the normal nervousness of the exam.
I take it was the Q part that let me down (44, a mere 69%, 38 for verbal which was still top 20% albeit my lowest ever)...
I didnt need any specific score, but I was justt expecting more, given the simulations. Would anybody know if top consultancies would still regard 660 as a good score?
I still can't believe it's so much lower than test prep...
Thanks
The London Pearson Vue centre had a major technical problem that, let alone forcing those that should have taken the exam early in the morning to basically forfeit it, made me start 2 hours late. I was irritated by it, but I guess that after the two essays I was just hindered by the normal nervousness of the exam.
I take it was the Q part that let me down (44, a mere 69%, 38 for verbal which was still top 20% albeit my lowest ever)...
I didnt need any specific score, but I was justt expecting more, given the simulations. Would anybody know if top consultancies would still regard 660 as a good score?
I still can't believe it's so much lower than test prep...
Thanks
))
