BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Difficult Selection Problem

Expert replies
by rickyishere » Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:32 pm
Hi,

Can the quants out here help in solving this problem:

A firm has 4 senior partners and 6 junior partners. How many different groups of 3 partners can be formed in which at least one member of the group is a senior partner. ( 2 groups are considered different if at least one group member is different).

a) 48 , b) 100, c) 120 , d) 288, e) 600.

I ended up getting an answer of 4C1*6C2 + 4C2*6C1 but it does not equate to any of the answers above.

Thanks
Ricky
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by thephoenix » Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:44 am
at least means >=1---> total- none

sme times using the other form helps much

we will find total combination and substract from that the total combination when none senior partners are selected

total partner=10(6+4)
we need to select =3
total combination=10C3=120

now total combination when none senior partners are selected
which means all three are from junior partners=6C3=20

reqd combination=120-20=100
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:48 am
rickyishere wrote:Hi,

Can the quants out here help in solving this problem:

A firm has 4 senior partners and 6 junior partners. How many different groups of 3 partners can be formed in which at least one member of the group is a senior partner. ( 2 groups are considered different if at least one group member is different).

a) 48 , b) 100, c) 120 , d) 288, e) 600.

I ended up getting an answer of 4C1*6C2 + 4C2*6C1 but it does not equate to any of the answers above.

Thanks
Ricky
in your approach u missed for the case when all three partner are senior=4C3=4
its actually [4c1*6C2+6C1*4C2+4C3]
adding this to your method gives 100

hth
Join the discussion

by harsh.champ » Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:15 am
rickyishere wrote:Hi,

Can the quants out here help in solving this problem:

A firm has 4 senior partners and 6 junior partners. How many different groups of 3 partners can be formed in which at least one member of the group is a senior partner. ( 2 groups are considered different if at least one group member is different).

a) 48 , b) 100, c) 120 , d) 288, e) 600.

I ended up getting an answer of 4C1*6C2 + 4C2*6C1 but it does not equate to any of the answers above.

Thanks
Ricky
The simplest solution is as follows:-
atleast one member of the group is a senior partner=total no. of selections- when all members are junior partners
= 10C3 - 6C3 = 120 - 20 = 100

Hey ricky ,you had solved like this:-
I ended up getting an answer of 4C1*6C2[1 senior,2juniors] + 4C2*6C1[2 seniors,1junior] = 60 + 36 = 96 but it does not equate to any of the answers above.
But you left 1 case over here:- [3 seniors,no junior] = 4C3 = 4

So,now you see adding 4 to your upper answer ,you get 100.B which is the answer.

Hope,you don't have any doubts now. :)
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P
Join the discussion

by rickyishere » Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:07 pm
harsh.champ wrote:
rickyishere wrote:Hi,

Can the quants out here help in solving this problem:

A firm has 4 senior partners and 6 junior partners. How many different groups of 3 partners can be formed in which at least one member of the group is a senior partner. ( 2 groups are considered different if at least one group member is different).

a) 48 , b) 100, c) 120 , d) 288, e) 600.

I ended up getting an answer of 4C1*6C2 + 4C2*6C1 but it does not equate to any of the answers above.

Thanks
Ricky
The simplest solution is as follows:-
atleast one member of the group is a senior partner=total no. of selections- when all members are junior partners
= 10C3 - 6C3 = 120 - 20 = 100

Hey ricky ,you had solved like this:-
I ended up getting an answer of 4C1*6C2[1 senior,2juniors] + 4C2*6C1[2 seniors,1junior] = 60 + 36 = 96 but it does not equate to any of the answers above.
But you left 1 case over here:- [3 seniors,no junior] = 4C3 = 4

So,now you see adding 4 to your upper answer ,you get 100.B which is the answer.

Hope,you don't have any doubts now. :)
I did not use the final combination because if I had selected 4C3 it would have meant that we are selecting all 3 seniors. However, choosing all 3 seniors can't be possible as per the problem because " 2 groups are considered different if at least one group member is different ". Thoughts on this?
Join the discussion

by harsh.champ » Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:36 pm
rickyishere wrote:
harsh.champ wrote:
rickyishere wrote:Hi,

Can the quants out here help in solving this problem:

A firm has 4 senior partners and 6 junior partners. How many different groups of 3 partners can be formed in which at least one member of the group is a senior partner. ( 2 groups are considered different if at least one group member is different).

a) 48 , b) 100, c) 120 , d) 288, e) 600.

I ended up getting an answer of 4C1*6C2 + 4C2*6C1 but it does not equate to any of the answers above.

Thanks
Ricky
The simplest solution is as follows:-
atleast one member of the group is a senior partner=total no. of selections- when all members are junior partners
= 10C3 - 6C3 = 120 - 20 = 100

Hey ricky ,you had solved like this:-
I ended up getting an answer of 4C1*6C2[1 senior,2juniors] + 4C2*6C1[2 seniors,1junior] = 60 + 36 = 96 but it does not equate to any of the answers above.
But you left 1 case over here:- [3 seniors,no junior] = 4C3 = 4

So,now you see adding 4 to your upper answer ,you get 100.B which is the answer.

Hope,you don't have any doubts now. :)
I did not use the final combination because if I had selected 4C3 it would have meant that we are selecting all 3 seniors. However, choosing all 3 seniors can't be possible as per the problem because " 2 groups are considered different if at least one group member is different ". Thoughts on this?
Well Ok,I am writing down those 4 selections over here.[In all of them atleast 1 group member are different,so we have 4 different cases]
Suppose the seniors are S1,S2,S3,S4.

4 possible selections:-
1) (S1,S2,S3)
2) (S1,S2,S4)
3) (S1,S3,S4)
4) (S2,S3,S4)

I guess this clears your doubt.

But I still don't understand why you didn't take the 4th case.
According to the above bold-faced statement of yours also,it is correct to take these 4 cases as they are all different.
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P
Join the discussion

by rickyishere » Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:22 pm
harsh.champ wrote:
rickyishere wrote:
harsh.champ wrote:
rickyishere wrote:Hi,

Can the quants out here help in solving this problem:

A firm has 4 senior partners and 6 junior partners. How many different groups of 3 partners can be formed in which at least one member of the group is a senior partner. ( 2 groups are considered different if at least one group member is different).

a) 48 , b) 100, c) 120 , d) 288, e) 600.

I ended up getting an answer of 4C1*6C2 + 4C2*6C1 but it does not equate to any of the answers above.

Thanks
Ricky
The simplest solution is as follows:-
atleast one member of the group is a senior partner=total no. of selections- when all members are junior partners
= 10C3 - 6C3 = 120 - 20 = 100

Hey ricky ,you had solved like this:-
I ended up getting an answer of 4C1*6C2[1 senior,2juniors] + 4C2*6C1[2 seniors,1junior] = 60 + 36 = 96 but it does not equate to any of the answers above.
But you left 1 case over here:- [3 seniors,no junior] = 4C3 = 4

So,now you see adding 4 to your upper answer ,you get 100.B which is the answer.

Hope,you don't have any doubts now. :)
I did not use the final combination because if I had selected 4C3 it would have meant that we are selecting all 3 seniors. However, choosing all 3 seniors can't be possible as per the problem because " 2 groups are considered different if at least one group member is different ". Thoughts on this?
Well Ok,I am writing down those 4 selections over here.[In all of them atleast 1 group member are different,so we have 4 different cases]
Suppose the seniors are S1,S2,S3,S4.

4 possible selections:-
1) (S1,S2,S3)
2) (S1,S2,S4)
3) (S1,S3,S4)
4) (S2,S3,S4)

I guess this clears your doubt.

But I still don't understand why you didn't take the 4th case.
According to the above bold-faced statement of yours also,it is correct to take these 4 cases as they are all different.
I did not choose the fourth case because to me " 2 groups are considered different if at least one group member is different " meant I need to have a senior and junior in the selection. I think this problem needs to be more specific because that last comment can be interpreted differently, well at least in my case.
Join the discussion

by harsh.champ » Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:36 am
rickyishere wrote:
harsh.champ wrote:
rickyishere wrote:
harsh.champ wrote:
rickyishere wrote:Hi,

Can the quants out here help in solving this problem:

A firm has 4 senior partners and 6 junior partners. How many different groups of 3 partners can be formed in which at least one member of the group is a senior partner. ( 2 groups are considered different if at least one group member is different).

a) 48 , b) 100, c) 120 , d) 288, e) 600.

I ended up getting an answer of 4C1*6C2 + 4C2*6C1 but it does not equate to any of the answers above.

Thanks
Ricky
The simplest solution is as follows:-
atleast one member of the group is a senior partner=total no. of selections- when all members are junior partners
= 10C3 - 6C3 = 120 - 20 = 100

Hey ricky ,you had solved like this:-
I ended up getting an answer of 4C1*6C2[1 senior,2juniors] + 4C2*6C1[2 seniors,1junior] = 60 + 36 = 96 but it does not equate to any of the answers above.
But you left 1 case over here:- [3 seniors,no junior] = 4C3 = 4

So,now you see adding 4 to your upper answer ,you get 100.B which is the answer.

Hope,you don't have any doubts now. :)
I did not use the final combination because if I had selected 4C3 it would have meant that we are selecting all 3 seniors. However, choosing all 3 seniors can't be possible as per the problem because " 2 groups are considered different if at least one group member is different ". Thoughts on this?
Well Ok,I am writing down those 4 selections over here.[In all of them atleast 1 group member are different,so we have 4 different cases]
Suppose the seniors are S1,S2,S3,S4.

4 possible selections:-
1) (S1,S2,S3)
2) (S1,S2,S4)
3) (S1,S3,S4)
4) (S2,S3,S4)

I guess this clears your doubt.

But I still don't understand why you didn't take the 4th case.
According to the above bold-faced statement of yours also,it is correct to take these 4 cases as they are all different.
I did not choose the fourth case because to me " 2 groups are considered different if at least one group member is different " meant I need to have a senior and junior in the selection. I think this problem needs to be more specific because that last comment can be interpreted differently, well at least in my case.
Well,usually we do consider the case when no junior is there.Unless otherwise given,we should not take the case that both the seniors and the juniors should be present.
In case of further query,I guess you should do "Word Translations" from Manhattan.
It is a very good guide and you will be more confident in formulating any word problem in the form of an equation.
Hope it helps :)
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P
Join the discussion