BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Difficult Parallelism & Verb-ing Modifiers - GMATPrep

Expert replies
by eastcoastrocks » Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:41 am
The hognose snake puts on an impressive bluff, hissing and rearing back, broadens the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does, feigning repeated strikes, but, having no dangerous fangs and no venom, eventually, if its pursuer is not cowed by the performance, will fall over and play dead.

(A) broadens the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does, feigning repeated strikes, but, having no dangerous fangs and no venom,
(B) broadens the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does and feigns repeated strikes, but with no dangerous fangs and no venom,
(C) broadening the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does and feigning repeated strikes, but it has no dangerous fangs and no venom, and
(D) broadening the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does and feigns repeated strikes, but with no dangerous fangs and no venom, and
(E) broadening the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does, feigning repeated strikes, but with no dangerous fangs and no venom, and

OA = C.
I know OA is official so it cannot be wrong. But I have my doubts and would appreciate if someone could help. Does the sentence not mean:

Snakes puts...by
1) Hissing and rearing back
2) Broadening....
3) feigning.. .
Since there are 3 elements in this list, shouldn't there be a comma between last two items. i.e. Broadening..... ,and feigning ?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by e-GMAT » Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:37 am
Lets look at the list that you have identified. The first element of your list is "hissing and rearing back"...Do you notice how this element is of the form "verb-ing and verb-ing". Now notice that this is in the non-underlined portion of the sentence. Now you move to the underlined portion of the sentence and you notice some more verb-ing modifiers. All these are basically explaining how the snake puts on his false show. Now first element of the list sets the stage for the next elements of the list. Thus, in reality the elements 2 and 3 as identified by you are part of element 2 itself. Thus, the list is

1: hissing and rearing back
2: broadening...and feigning...

Notice how both elements follow the same structure - verb-ing..and verb-ing...
And hence the punctuation is correct as is...i.e. no comma+and between broadening and feigning.
Join the discussion

by eastcoastrocks » Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:53 pm
Thanks e-GMAT for clarifying this. If you don't mind, I have another question. As you indicated, the list contains 2 elements. But why are these elements not connected using "and". Why are they connected using comma only?
Join the discussion

by e-GMAT » Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:12 pm
I can give answer to this in two ways:

First way: When you have such adverbs (modifying clauses), and you only have 2 such in the list, for the sake of flow of the sentence, you may omit "and". Notice again, this is an official sentence. So we need to accept this as the correct construction and make a note of it for future reference.

Second way: Lets forget for a minute the identified parallelism and lets consider the sentence in the following way:

Clause 1, mod 1, mod 2.
Where
clause 1 = the hognose snake puts up an impressive bluff
mod 1 = hissing and rearing
mod2 = broadening...and feigning...

Now you may consider mod 1 to modify the preceding clause - clause 1
And mod 2 to modify the preceding clause as well. But this preceding clause contains mod 1 as well. i.e. Clause 1, mod1.

So here are the two ways in which you can justify the punctuation used.

Make a note of this correct construction.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1