BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

difficult except question

Expert replies
by abhijeetsinghai » Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:12 pm
Lists of hospitals have been compiled showing which hospitals have patient death rates exceeding the national average. The data have been adjusted to allow for differences in the ages of patients.
Each of the following, if true, provides a good logical ground for hospitals to object to interpreting rank on these lists as one of the indices of the quality of hospital care EXCEPT:
(A) Rank order might indicate insignificant differences, rather than large differences, in numbers of patient deaths.
(B) Hospitals that keep patients longer are likely to have higher death rates than those that discharge patients earlier but do not record deaths of patients at home after discharge.
(C) Patients who are very old on admission to a hospital are less likely than younger patients to survive the same types of illnesses or surgical procedures.
(D) Some hospitals serve a larger proportion of low-income patients, who tend to be more seriously ill when admitted to a hospital.
(E) For-profit hospitals sometimes do not provide intensive-care units and other expensive services for very sick patients but refer or transfer such patients to other hospitals.


I am confused between A and C..pls throw some light..Thanks in advance...
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Eye-on-the-Prize » Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:35 pm
I was actually choosing between C and D, but assuming you are aware of the OA, I am more confident that it is probably C.

a) Lets say we have 3 hospitals, X, Y, & Z, on the list in that order. X has 100 deaths, Y has 2, and Z has 1. If the rates are not listed, but merely the names of the hospitals, then one cannot tell that X is drastically worse than Y and Z. Therefore this seems to be a logical reason to object the use of this list as an indices of the quality of hospital care.

b) Also a logical argument - a hospital that keeps patients longer will likely have a better quality of health care but risks losing more patients.

c) This is not a very logical ground because hospitals treat people of all ages (unless there are some hospitals that I am not aware of the exclusively treat elderly people)

d) This is questionably logical, but I believe an added inference must be made in order to connect the dots. Some hospitals are located in low-income areas, which treat a larger percentage of low-income patients than others. In order to presume that this is a reason the hospital has higher mortality rates would be based on the assumption that low-income patients cannot afford comparable health care plans. Currently, this is probably a safe assumption, nonetheless, it is still an assumption.

e) Clearly logical

OA?
Expect to win
Join the discussion

by abhijeetsinghai » Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:56 pm
OA: C
Thanks for your kind help.
Join the discussion

Re: difficult except question

by Ian Stewart » Fri Mar 06, 2009 10:34 pm
abhijeetsinghai wrote:Lists of hospitals have been compiled showing which hospitals have patient D€@th rates exceeding the national average. The data have been adjusted to allow for differences in the ages of patients.
Each of the following, if true, provides a good logical ground for hospitals to object to interpreting rank on these lists as one of the indices of the quality of hospital care EXCEPT:
(A) Rank order might indicate insignificant differences, rather than large differences, in numbers of patient deaths.
(B) Hospitals that keep patients longer are likely to have higher D€@th rates than those that discharge patients earlier but do not record deaths of patients at home after discharge.
(C) Patients who are very old on admission to a hospital are less likely than younger patients to survive the same types of illnesses or surgical procedures.
(D) Some hospitals serve a larger proportion of low-income patients, who tend to be more seriously ill when admitted to a hospital.
(E) For-profit hospitals sometimes do not provide intensive-care units and other expensive services for very sick patients but refer or transfer such patients to other hospitals.
I've highlighted the key part of the stem above. The data has already been adjusted for the age of patients, so answer C is not a relevant objection.

As for D, I don't find as Eye-on-the-Prize does above, that it requires any significant assumption. It is not that some hospitals serve low income patients that is relevant here; it's that, as D says, these patients are 'more seriously ill' than at other hospitals.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by mason77 » Sat May 14, 2016 1:21 am
I like explanation on C
Join the discussion