BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

didnt get this one, an explanation would help

Expert replies
by melon » Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:22 pm
A recent research study of undergraduate students analyzed the effects of music on human emotions. Each of the 200 participants attended at least 1 two-hour concert of classical music per week over the course of 12 weeks of their spring semester. At the end of the experiment, all of the students filled out a questionnaire assessing their emotional state. Based on the results of the questionnaires, all of the 10 students who attended the greatest number of concerts reported lower stress levels and higher satisfaction with their lives. Also, most of the 20 students who attended the fewest number of concerts reported below-average levels of emotional comfort.

Which of the following must be true based on the evidence presented above?


Most of the 200 participants improved their emotional state and lowered their stress levels.



During each week of the experiment, the participants spent at least 2 hours less on their academic work as a result of concert attendance.



Listening to classical music for at least 2 hours per week improves the emotional well-being of the majority of young adults.



More than 6 participants attended at least 14 concerts during the course of the experiment.



At least some of the students participated in the study in order to gain free access to classical concerts.
Ans D
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by mundasingh123 » Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:51 am
i got to D after a POE though i was skeptical about the answer .
Initially i wasnt getting the idea of how D could be correct Inference
This seemed like an integrated reasoning problem straight out of an lsat horror paper

The key to solving this question lies in arranging the numbers of concerts attended by each participant
The important thing that one must pay attention to is the presence of article the in front of the greatest and fewest .
It means only 10 guys attended the greatest numbers and only 20 guys attended the fewest numbers of concerts .
so arranging
The minimum number any guy can attend is 12 . so 20 guys attended 12 concerts each .

this leaves us with 180 guys

the numbers of concerts attended by top 10 guys has to be different from the numbers of concerts attended by the reamaining 170 guys(Remember the equation 10 + 170 + 20 ) .This means that 170 guys are placed in between the top 10 and the bottom 20 guys .The minimum number of concerts that the top 10 guys can attend can be 14 . So the remaining guys must attend 13 concerts each .
any change in the numbers of concerts attended by the bottom 20 guys or middle 170 guys will Validate D as the answer to this CR .
Last edited by mundasingh123 on Thu Jul 14, 2011 8:37 am, edited 2 times in total.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Thu Jul 14, 2011 8:25 am
Check this out..

All tough inference questions are math problems :)
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion