BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

did any of the players eat a whole pizzza?

Expert replies
by uptowngirl92 » Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:04 am
Chanse took his daughter's soccer team for Pizza,1/6 of thh team had exactly 1 slice each,1/6 of thh team had exactly 2 slices each,1/6 of thh team had exactly 3 slices each and the rest had atleast 4 slices each.If a whole pizza consists of 6 slices,did any of the players eat a whole pizzza?

1.there are 12 players on the team.
2.The players ate an avg. of 3 slices per person.

Please give explanations for your answers!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by shibal » Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:14 am
IMO C
Stmt 1 - 12 players
2pla ate 1
2pla ate 2
2pla ate 3
6pla ate +4.... A large pizza consists of 6 pieces, so they could have eaten exactly 4 pieces or 1 could have eaten more then a whole pizza.... Insuff

Stmt2- not much cuz we don't know how many players we have

1+2 we can see that they eat a total of 36 slices, hence we can see if any player ate a whole pizza

Hope it helps
Join the discussion

by yogami » Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:42 am
IMO its E.
When yo combine both statements we know that 12 slices are eaten by 6 players. The remaining six players should have eaten 36 - 12 = 24 slices amongst them
Now we also know that each player has eaten at least four slices. If you assume that each player eats eactly four slices then none of them has had six slices cos 24 evenly divides into six players into four slices per head. So its insuff
200 or 800. It don't matter no more.
Join the discussion

by shibal » Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:00 am
We are not assuming each eat 4 slices of pizza, it`s given that the rest ate at least 4. If we know that the exact value of pizzas were 36 and that there are 24 slices left to be distributed among 6 players that each eats at least 4 slices, we can know if one ate a whole pizza. IMO C

OA?????
Join the discussion

by vinayakdl » Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:09 am
yogami wrote:IMO its E.
When yo combine both statements we know that 12 slices are eaten by 6 players. The remaining six players should have eaten 36 - 12 = 24 slices amongst them
Now we also know that each player has eaten at least four slices. If you assume that each player eats eactly four slices then none of them has had six slices cos 24 evenly divides into six players into four slices per head. So its insuff
so we can say that none of the players ate entire pizza...i agree with C.

Vinayak
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Wed Jul 22, 2009 7:49 pm
IMO - C
vinayakdl wrote:
yogami wrote:IMO its E.
When yo combine both statements we know that 12 slices are eaten by 6 players. The remaining six players should have eaten 36 - 12 = 24 slices amongst them
Now we also know that each player has eaten at least four slices. If you assume that each player eats eactly four slices then none of them has had six slices cos 24 evenly divides into six players into four slices per head. So its insuff
so we can say that none of the players ate entire pizza...i agree with C.

Vinayak
Join the discussion

by uptowngirl92 » Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:08 am
Guys!!OA:B..
Join the discussion

another tricky ds

by aimster7888 » Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:25 am
1. Insuff per reason stated above

2.

Let T be the number of players
Number of 1 slice eaters - 1/6T, num. of total 1 slices consumed = 1/6T
Number of 2 slice eaters - same - 1/6T, num of total slices - 1/3T
Number of 3 slice eaters - 1/6T, num of total slices - 1/2T
Remainining players - 1/2T, num total slices = (1/2T)Y, where Y>=4

Average is sum divided by T

( T+(1/2)TY ) / T = 3

= T(1+Y/2) / T = 3
= 1 + Y/2 = 3
= Y/2 = 2
..Y=4

...Sufficient.. B
Join the discussion