A famous foreign dictator recently triumphed in a lawsuit against his booking agency, which, after failing to find him at either his palace or his bunker, used a similar-looking impersonator to perform his rendition of a well-known trademark rant for a soft drink commercial. Due to the outcome of that suit, advertisers will stop hiring impersonators for commercials. Thus, ad costs will increase because famous dictators charge more than impersonators do.
This conclusion is flawed because it makes which of the following unwarranted assumptions?
Choices
A Most listeners cannot distinguish whether a speech is being performed by a famous dictator or an impersonator.
B Ads which use famous dictators are often more effective than those which use impersonators.
C Some famous speeches' original versions cannot be licensed for commercial use.
D Booking agencies will continue using impersonators in place of famous dictators.
E Advertisers will want to use original speeches.
OA:
E. This is very similar to an OG question. I have a doubt with option C. If we remove the word ' some ' from the option, will the choice then become a strong contender to be the answer ?
This conclusion is flawed because it makes which of the following unwarranted assumptions?
Choices
A Most listeners cannot distinguish whether a speech is being performed by a famous dictator or an impersonator.
B Ads which use famous dictators are often more effective than those which use impersonators.
C Some famous speeches' original versions cannot be licensed for commercial use.
D Booking agencies will continue using impersonators in place of famous dictators.
E Advertisers will want to use original speeches.
OA:
E. This is very similar to an OG question. I have a doubt with option C. If we remove the word ' some ' from the option, will the choice then become a strong contender to be the answer ?
