BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Diatoms

Expert replies
by gmatmachoman » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:38 am
Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in Antarctic ice during the Earth's last ice age found that the ice-age atmosphere had contained unusually large amounts of ferrous material and surprisingly small amounts of carbon dioxide. One scientist noted that algae absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The scientist hypothesized that the ferrous material, which was contained in atmospheric dust, had promoted a great increase in the population of Antarctica algae such as diatoms.

Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the scientist's hypothesis?

A) Diatoms are a microscopic form of algae that has remained largely unchanged since the last ice age.

(B) Computer models suggest that a large increase in ferrous material today could greatly promote the growth of oceanic algae.

(C) The dust found in the air bubbles trapped in Antarctica ice contained other minerals in addition to the ferrous material.

(D) Sediment from the ocean floor near Antarctica reflects no increase, during the last ice age, in the rate at which the shells that diatoms leave when they die accumulated.

(E) Algae that currently grow in the oceans near Antarctica do not appear to be harmed by even a large increase in exposure to ferrous material.

IMO [spoiler]C Vs D[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sumanr84 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:18 am
I will go with C.

C is clearly undermining the scientists hypothesis that ferrous material promoted increase in diatoms, rather it could have been due to other minerals.

D - We have no information whether Sediment contain ferrous materials or the amount of ferrous materials present in Sediments, whose increase/decrease could justify the hypothesis.
Join the discussion

by komal » Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:26 am
gmatmachoman wrote:Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in Antarctic ice during the Earth's last ice age found that the ice-age atmosphere had contained unusually large amounts of ferrous material and surprisingly small amounts of carbon dioxide. One scientist noted that algae absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The scientist hypothesized that the ferrous material, which was contained in atmospheric dust, had promoted a great increase in the population of Antarctica algae such as diatoms.

Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the scientist's hypothesis?

Premise : Ice age atmosphere contained large numbers of ferrous material and small amount of carbon di oxide
Premise : Algae absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere


Conclusion : Ferrous material had promoted increase in algae population of antartica


A) Diatoms are a microscopic form of algae that has remained largely unchanged since the last ice age.
INCORRECT : Irrelevant. Diatoms is only used as an example in the stimulus. Furthermore this answer choice does nothing to weaken the conclusion.

(B) Computer models suggest that a large increase in ferrous material today could greatly promote the growth of oceanic algae.
INCORRECT : Strengthens the argument by stating that ferrous material could indeed promote the growth of oceanic algae.

(C) The dust found in the air bubbles trapped in Antarctica ice contained other minerals in addition to the ferrous material.
CORRECT : This undermines the argument by stating that there is possibility of some other cause (other minerals) for the stated effect (increase in algae population).

(D) Sediment from the ocean floor near Antarctica reflects no increase, during the last ice age, in the rate at which the shells that diatoms leave when they die accumulated.
INCORRECT : Irrelevant/ Out of Scope

(E) Algae that currently grow in the oceans near Antarctica do not appear to be harmed by even a large increase in exposure to ferrous material.
INCORRECT : Irrelevant. Issue is not about harm caused to algae by ferrous material.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:27 pm
Join the discussion

by vijay_venky » Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:54 am
I think option D is too narrow to be considered because the stimulus just gives diatom as an example of antarctic algae, and the absence of the increase in this particular algae does not effect the conclusion.

But C says there are other minerals along with ferrous minerals which puts the hypothesis of the scientist under suspicion.
Join the discussion