BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DIAPERS

Expert replies
by sogmat » Wed Apr 15, 2009 6:46 pm
Pedro: Unlike cloth diapers, disposable diapers are a threat to the environment. Sixteen billion disposable diapers are discarded annually, filling up landfills at an alarming rate. So people must stop buying disposable diapers and use cloth diapers.
Maria: But you forget that cloth diapers must be washed in hot water, which requires energy. Moreover, the resulting wastewater pollutes our rivers. When families use diaper services, diapers must be delivered by fuel-burning trucks that pollute the air and add to traffic congestion.
Maria objects to Pedro’s argument by
(A) claiming that Pedro overstates the negative evidence about disposable diapers in the course of his argument in favor of cloth diapers
(B) indicating that Pedro draws a hasty conclusion, based on inadequate evidence about cloth diapers
(C) pointing out that there is an ambiguous use of the word “disposable” in Pedro’s argument
(D) demonstrating that cloth diapers are a far more serious threat to the environment than disposable diapers are
(E) suggesting that the economic advantages of cloth diapers outweigh whatever environmental damage they may cause
OA B
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by 4seasoncentre » Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:20 pm
I agree with the OA.

A) "Overstate" is too harsh a word. The evidence he stated is presumably accurate and Maria did not disagree with that evidence.
B) Pedro's argument is based entirely on evidence against disposable diapers. He mentioned nothing of cloth diapers, which implies he had inadequate information about them.
C) Maria mentions no such ambiguity. She doesn't disagree that you really do toss them out when done.
D) Maris doesn't claim that cloth diapers are more harmful- she just argues that they also have their flaws.
E) Economics are not discussed.

Also, who's ever heard of a cloth diaper laundry service? :lol:
Join the discussion

by delhiboy1979 » Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:47 pm
Agree with the OA:

A) claiming that Pedro overstates the negative evidence about disposable diapers in the course of his argument in favor of cloth diapers
he just makes a statement, doesnt overstate

(B) indicating that Pedro draws a hasty conclusion, based on inadequate evidence about cloth diapers
looks good

(C) pointing out that there is an ambiguous use of the word “disposable” in Pedro’s argument
no ambiguity in the use of 'disposable'

(D) demonstrating that cloth diapers are a far more serious threat to the environment than disposable diapers are
he is in favour of cloth diapers

(E) suggesting that the economic advantages of cloth diapers outweigh whatever environmental damage they may cause
out of scope.[/b]
Join the discussion

by samanthaJ79 » Sun May 15, 2016 4:48 am
In my opinion D is the most logical one.
Join the discussion