BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Development planners

Expert replies
by success1111 » Tue May 05, 2009 1:22 am
Development planners determined the number of new housing units needed in a certain area by using the formula H = kJ, where H is the number of new housing units needed in the area, J is the number of new jobs to be created in the area, and k is a constant. How many new housing units did the planners determine were needed?

(1) The number of new jobs to be created was 60,000.

(2) According to the formula used by the planners, if 37,500 jobs were to be created, then 7,500 new housing units would be needed
Trust but verify.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by bluementor » Tue May 05, 2009 3:13 am
Statement 1:

J = 60,000. However, we don't know the value of k. Insufficient.

Statement 2:

if J = 37,500, then H = 7500. We can calculate the value of k. However, we still lack the actual number of new jobs that were created. Insufficient.

Both statements together:

we know k from statement 2 and we know J from statement 1. Hence, we can use H=kJ to solve for H. Sufficient.

Choose C.

___________________

A different way to think about this is to picture the relationship between H and J on the xy-plane. Let's say H is the y-axis and J is the x-axis. With this, you will see that H=kJ forms a straight line starting from the origin (if J=0, then H must equal 0, regardless of k) and that k is essentially the slope of this line.

In statement 1, with the value of J known, you cannot determine H unless you know the slope. In statement 2, you can construct the H=kJ line since you know a second point (37500, 7500). However, you don't know the actual number of jobs (J) that was created. From this you can conclude that both statements are required to answer the question.


-BM-
Join the discussion

by success1111 » Tue May 05, 2009 7:29 pm
bluementor wrote:Statement 1:

J = 60,000. However, we don't know the value of k. Insufficient.

Statement 2:

if J = 37,500, then H = 7500. We can calculate the value of k. However, we still lack the actual number of new jobs that were created. Insufficient.

Both statements together:

we know k from statement 2 and we know J from statement 1. Hence, we can use H=kJ to solve for H. Sufficient.

Choose C.



___________________

A different way to think about this is to picture the relationship between H and J on the xy-plane. Let's say H is the y-axis and J is the x-axis. With this, you will see that H=kJ forms a straight line starting from the origin (if J=0, then H must equal 0, regardless of k) and that k is essentially the slope of this line.

In statement 1, with the value of J known, you cannot determine H unless you know the slope. In statement 2, you can construct the H=kJ line since you know a second point (37500, 7500). However, you don't know the actual number of jobs (J) that was created. From this you can conclude that both statements are required to answer the question.


-BM-
OA is C. This is the another approach i was looking for.Thanks a lot
Trust but verify.
Join the discussion