BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

determining relevant info

Expert replies
by rahul.s » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:10 pm
Accountant: The residents of Trenakintown have long supported the building of a large shopping mall in the town's center, and almost every winter the local newspaper has reported that the town's best construction company, Buildacorp, plans to begin such a project by the summer, but this construction has never begun. However, we have just learned that this winter, Buildacorp has satisfied the budget allocation requirement for large-scale construction projects by submitting a detailed breakdown of proposed expenditures to Trenakintown's Committee of Special Projects. So, it is very likely that Buildacorp will begin construction of the large shopping mall in the town's center this summer.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the accountant's argument?

A) Has any other construction company that has satisfied the budget allocation requirement for large-scale construction projects reported a lower estimate of its proposed expenditures?

B) Is submitting a detailed break down of proposed expenditures the only way to satisfy Trenakintown's Committee of Special Projects's budget allocation requirements?

C) Did the information recently reported by the accountant come directly from Trenakintown's Committee of Special Projects?

D) Is the amount that Buildacorp proposes to spend greater than what the Committee had anticipated?

E) Has Buildacorp also satisfied the budget allocation requirements for large-scale construction projects before any other summers?

OA: E
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by rahul.s » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:14 pm
i was initially confused between B and E. just as i was about to select option E, i noticed the words 'However, we have just learned that this winter, Buildacorp has satisfied the budget allocation requirement for large-scale construction projects by submitting a detailed breakdown of proposed expenditures to Trenakintown's Committee of Special Projects.'

it states that this winter, Buildacorp satisfied the required budget allocation. hence, i assumed that, in the previous years, they had not satisfied this criterion. so it would reasonable to know whether this is the only prerequisite, would it not?
Join the discussion

by vijay_venky » Tue Feb 02, 2010 3:44 am
Let us break this down,

Accountant:

P1. Residents supported the construction for a very long time.
P2. every winter the local news paper published that Buildacorp plans to begin.
P3. but the construction never began.

P4. but this winter we learned that BC satisfied the body for budget allocation.
P5. so it is very likely that the company will begin its construction.

Assuming that the use of but signifies the uniqueness of the measure (satisfying the body), I would say is not appropriate.
because we have not been apprised of the procedures followed in the past.

now let us say we are held up with the two options that you have mentioned in the previous post.

B- Now either the answer is an yes or a no, it was provided in the stimulus that the company has satisfied the body. Now whether there is any other way of satisfying the body is irrelevant.

I found A closer, but "lower estimate" was something that I was skeptical of.

So I chose E.
Join the discussion

by dmitriyaleyev » Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:42 pm
E
We know the project couldnt be started for years. We may then assume that every year the plan was proposed but the project was still on freeze. hence, what makes us think that the fact of satisfying comission means a start of a project?
Join the discussion