logitech wrote:ronniecoleman wrote:logitech wrote:sumitkhurana wrote:OA is A.
Explaination - which correctly describes "Destruction of Jerusalem".
Shouldn't "which" modify "Jerusalem" only.
Sumit,
It is not the BEST SC question I have ever seen but it has an interesting point
Destruction of Jerusalem VS Jerusalem's Destruction , which
Let's find out!
Logitech..
totally agree this is not well written SC
but i have generally seen that x of y , is a better idiom then y 's x on GMATLAND...
correct me if i am wromg
I would not say BETTER because I don't know why y's x is WORSE than x of y , but you are right the latter form is used more often. But do you think that which refers to X and Y in the following examples:
X of Y, which
Y's X, which
???
searching thru forums , i could only deduce that the WHICH rule is not something that should be hardwired..
i have seen many instances where.. which does not refer to the immediate noun but a far off one..
even RON has in one of his posts mentioned.. not to religiously follow this rule...
he gave an example,
the picture on the wall, which is good is mine..
which here is not refering to wall but picture....
which totally freaked me out@@
so i go by the question
i guess destruction of x, which will refer to destruction !
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856