BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

department manager

Expert replies
by success1111 » Tue May 05, 2009 8:16 pm
A department manager distributed a number of pens, pencils,
and pads among the staff in the department, with each staff
member receiving x pens, y pencils, and z pads. How many
staff members were in the department?

(1) The numbers of pens, pencils, and pads
that each staff member received were in
the retio 2:3:4, respectively.

(2) The manager distributed a total of
18 pens, 27 pencils, and 36 pads.
Trust but verify.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: department manager

by Vemuri » Tue May 05, 2009 9:59 pm
IMO C

Stmt1: Provides only the ratio. Not sufficient
Stmt2: Provides the total number of pens, pencils & pads distributed. Each of the staff may have received 2pens, 3pencils, 4pads (in this case there are 9 staff) or 6pens, 9pencils, 12pads (in this case there are 3 staff) or there may be only 1 staff who received 18pens, 27pencils, 36pads. Information not sufficient.

Combining both the statements, we can determine there are 9 staff.
Join the discussion

Re: department manager

by Uri » Wed May 06, 2009 9:20 am
Vemuri wrote:IMO C

Stmt1: Provides only the ratio. Not sufficient
Stmt2: Provides the total number of pens, pencils & pads distributed. Each of the staff may have received 2pens, 3pencils, 4pads (in this case there are 9 staff) or 6pens, 9pencils, 12pads (in this case there are 3 staff) or there may be only 1 staff who received 18pens, 27pencils, 36pads. Information not sufficient.

Combining both the statements, we can determine there are 9 staff.
why are you ignoring a total of 3 staff members?

My logic:
St 1: We can not determine number with only ratios, except for some special cases. And this is not one of those special cases!

St 2: No of staff can be 9 or any factor of 9, i.e 3 or 1. (See GCM of 18, 27 and 36 is 9). So it is also insufficient.

Combining (1) and (2), we don't get any new information. Whether the toal no. of staff is 1, 3 or 9, the ratio of pen, pencil and pad given to each member will be 2:3:4 So both the statements together are also insufficient. Hence, answer is (E).

Please provide the OA.
Join the discussion

Re: department manager

by success1111 » Wed May 06, 2009 4:38 pm
Uri wrote:
Vemuri wrote:IMO C

Stmt1: Provides only the ratio. Not sufficient
Stmt2: Provides the total number of pens, pencils & pads distributed. Each of the staff may have received 2pens, 3pencils, 4pads (in this case there are 9 staff) or 6pens, 9pencils, 12pads (in this case there are 3 staff) or there may be only 1 staff who received 18pens, 27pencils, 36pads. Information not sufficient.

Combining both the statements, we can determine there are 9 staff.
why are you ignoring a total of 3 staff members?

My logic:
St 1: We can not determine number with only ratios, except for some special cases. And this is not one of those special cases!

St 2: No of staff can be 9 or any factor of 9, i.e 3 or 1. (See GCM of 18, 27 and 36 is 9). So it is also insufficient.

Combining (1) and (2), we don't get any new information. Whether the toal no. of staff is 1, 3 or 9, the ratio of pen, pencil and pad given to each member will be 2:3:4 So both the statements together are also insufficient. Hence, answer is (E).

Please provide the OA.
OA is E.Very tricky question.
Trust but verify.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Wed May 06, 2009 5:02 pm
Together:

2:3:4

18:27:36

3 staff members each getting 6 pens,9 pencils and 12 pads
9 staff members each getting 2 pens,3 pencils and 4 pads

The ratios is maintained in both cases above

Hence e

Well put, Uri!
Join the discussion

Re: department manager

by Vemuri » Wed May 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Uri wrote:why are you ignoring a total of 3 staff members?

True, missed out completely. Thanks for pointing it out.
Join the discussion

by mzalmati » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:36 am
This is by far the most accurate explanation that i've read for this question.
Uri wrote:
Vemuri wrote:IMO C

Stmt1: Provides only the ratio. Not sufficient
Stmt2: Provides the total number of pens, pencils & pads distributed. Each of the staff may have received 2pens, 3pencils, 4pads (in this case there are 9 staff) or 6pens, 9pencils, 12pads (in this case there are 3 staff) or there may be only 1 staff who received 18pens, 27pencils, 36pads. Information not sufficient.

Combining both the statements, we can determine there are 9 staff.
why are you ignoring a total of 3 staff members?

My logic:
St 1: We can not determine number with only ratios, except for some special cases. And this is not one of those special cases!

St 2: No of staff can be 9 or any factor of 9, i.e 3 or 1. (See GCM of 18, 27 and 36 is 9). So it is also insufficient.

Combining (1) and (2), we don't get any new information. Whether the toal no. of staff is 1, 3 or 9, the ratio of pen, pencil and pad given to each member will be 2:3:4 So both the statements together are also insufficient. Hence, answer is (E).

Please provide the OA.
Join the discussion