BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Demographers forecast

Expert replies
by saurabh2525_gupta » Wed Sep 28, 2011 9:23 pm
To develop more accurate population forecasts,
demographers have to know a great deal more than
now about the social and economic
determinants of
fertility.
(A) have to know a great deal more than now about
the social and economic
(B) have to know a great deal more than they do
now about the social and economical
(C) would have to know a great deal more than they
do now about the social and economical
(D) would have to know a great deal more than they
do now about the social and economic
(E) would have to know a great deal more than now
about the social and economic

It looks like an if.....then construction. if(develop forecast) then ( need to know more). The if clause is in the present tense, so according to the if.. then rule, then clause should be in the future tense. Here the correct choice is the one that does not obey this rule.

Please help me understand gap in my understanding.

Best Regards,
JOHN
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by gunjan1208 » Wed Sep 28, 2011 10:05 pm
D

Reason 1: Use of would is needed (this zeros on to C and D]
Reason 2: Economic is used (Economical is not right word)
Join the discussion

by amit2k9 » Wed Sep 28, 2011 10:13 pm
economic is the correct choice here.options B and C eliminated.
Among A,D and E.

the forecast models have to be developed.Hence, its in future tense.
A is eliminated.
Between D and E,
after than a subject is required,which is missing in E.
Thus D it is.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
Join the discussion

by saurabh2525_gupta » Wed Sep 28, 2011 10:14 pm
gunjan1208 wrote:D

Reason 1: Use of would is needed (this zeros on to C and D]
Reason 2: Economic is used (Economical is not right word)
I understand that since it is a conditional sentence, WOULD is required but the entire thing does not fit in the rule.
Join the discussion

by gunjan1208 » Wed Sep 28, 2011 10:36 pm
Hi Saurabh,

What exactly is the issue you have understanding D. I would be able to explain once I know your view.
Join the discussion

by saurabh2525_gupta » Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:58 pm
Hi Gunjan,

Thank you for replying.

I agree with you on your explanation.

I point where I am stuck is that Verb Tenses can be used to express subjunctive mood with if...then construction. According to that, if(clause in present tense), then (clause should be in future tense)
if(clause in past tense), then ( WOULD + infinitive form)

Here the if clause is in present tense, so then clause should be in future tense. Also it should not use WOULD but the correct answer does so.

Thanks,
JOHN
Join the discussion

by gunjan1208 » Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:15 pm
Saurabh,
Well said. In fact, I thought so. But since you have to choose out of 5 choices, look for the perfect answer not the ideal one.

I chose would because of the following reasoning:
Focus on first two:
(A) have to know a great deal more than now about
the social and economic
(B) have to know a great deal more than they do
now
about the social and economical

I would have gone with these tho choices if they did not have emboldened portion alongwith them.

This portion tells that the task is going to happen in future. Other 3 choices universally have "would". Therefore, though it crossed my mind, I did not bother for logic+rule further.
Join the discussion

by saurabh2525_gupta » Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:24 pm
gunjan1208 wrote:Saurabh,
Well said. In fact, I thought so. But since you have to choose out of 5 choices, look for the perfect answer not the ideal one.

I chose would because of the following reasoning:
Focus on first two:
(A) have to know a great deal more than now about
the social and economic
(B) have to know a great deal more than they do
now
about the social and economical

I would have gone with these tho choices if they did not have emboldened portion alongwith them.

This portion tells that the task is going to happen in future. Other 3 choices universally have "would". Therefore, though it crossed my mind, I did not bother for logic+rule further.

You are talking about the portion in red, green or black
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1