BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Deck of Cards - A beautiful Pair

Expert replies
by Jmx » Fri Jan 08, 2010 12:07 pm
QUESTION: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, there are 2 cards in the deck that have the same value.

Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value?

ANSWER: 17/33 using (1-x) technic.

BUT calculating directly P I get 18/33: close but different! Where I am going wrong??

P = Total Desired Outcomes / Total Possible Outcomes

Total Possible Outcomes = Choice of 4 cards out of 12 = C(12,4) = 11x5x9 = 495

Total Desired Outcomes = Choice of 2 similar cards x Choice of 2 complementary cards (similar or not) = 6 x C(10,2) = 6x5x9 = 270

So, P = 6x5x9 / 11x5x9 = 6/11 = 18/33

Please help: where am I going wrong???

Many thanks!!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:56 pm
Jmx wrote:QUESTION: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, there are 2 cards in the deck that have the same value.

Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value?

ANSWER: 17/33 using (1-x) technic.

BUT calculating directly P I get 18/33: close but different! Where I am going wrong??

P = Total Desired Outcomes / Total Possible Outcomes

Total Possible Outcomes = Choice of 4 cards out of 12 = C(12,4) = 11x5x9 = 495

Total Desired Outcomes = Choice of 2 similar cards x Choice of 2 complementary cards (similar or not) = 6 x C(10,2) = 6x5x9 = 270

So, P = 6x5x9 / 11x5x9 = 6/11 = 18/33

Please help: where am I going wrong???

Many thanks!!!
The (1-x) technique sounds good (P = 1 - (1 x 10/11 x 8/10 x 6/9) = 17/33

For the other technique, the problem is in blue. You first determine the guaranteed pair and then choose two other cards. This allows for us to count the same combinations twice.

For example, our 2 similar cards can be 5 and 5, and then the 2 complementary cards can be 4 and 4. This would count as one outcome.
For example, our 2 similar cards can be 4 and 4, and then the 2 complementary cards can be 5 and 5. This would count as another outcome, even though it is the same as the first outcome.

So, the number 6x5x9 ia too large. We need to subtract all of the outcomes that were counted twice. These are all of the outcomes where we have two pairs of values (e.g. 4, 4, 5, 5)
In how many ways can we select two pairs of values?
We have 6 different numbers and we need to select 2 of them to be paired up.
This can be accomplished in C(6,2) ways (or 15 ways).

So, the answer is now [6x5x9 - 15]/11x5x9 = 17/33
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Jmx » Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:49 pm
Thanks Brent!!! I particularly like the way you worked back to 17/33. Cheers.
Join the discussion

by bhaskarjain » Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:56 pm
Jmx wrote:QUESTION: Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, there are 2 cards in the deck that have the same value.

Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value?

ANSWER: 17/33 using (1-x) technic.

BUT calculating directly P I get 18/33: close but different! Where I am going wrong??

P = Total Desired Outcomes / Total Possible Outcomes

Total Possible Outcomes = Choice of 4 cards out of 12 = C(12,4) = 11x5x9 = 495

Total Desired Outcomes = Choice of 2 similar cards x Choice of 2 complementary cards (similar or not) = 6 x C(10,2) = 6x5x9 = 270

So, P = 6x5x9 / 11x5x9 = 6/11 = 18/33

Please help: where am I going wrong???

Many thanks!!!
My approach towards this is a bit different. Please help me identify is there any mistake in it.

Total possible outcomes= 12x11x10x9
Total desired outcome = getting exactly one pair + gettting exactly 2 pairs
= 12x10x8x1+12x10x1x1
So, P = 1/11
Join the discussion