Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Day 6 - Data Sufficiency Practice (OG, 13th Ed), Problem 148

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic
Expert replies
by ostrowskiamy » Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:43 am
Hi guys! Can anyone help me with this?

"Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 24, .82, 5.096 are three terminating decimals. If r and s are positive integers and the ratio r/s is expressed as a decimal, is r/s a terminating decimal?
1) 90 < r < 100
2) s = 4

I understand why it's not 1 (aka, eliminate answer "A" and "D" as correct) but why is the answer to this "B"? According to the back of the book: "Division by the number 4 must terminate: the remainder when dividing 4 must be 0, 1, 2, or 3, so the quotient must end with .0, .25, .5, or .75, respectively." I think I'm missing something obvious, but...I don't understand that last line! Can someone please explain this to me in a simpler way? How do I know it will never repeat, and will definitely terminate, for any number that I divide by 4, because of the ".0, .25, .5 or .75" ? If I test a bunch of numbers, is that what will happen and I just need to "know" that this is a rule that applies for 4? Or is there a rule I can use to scale out to other questions like this, where I'm not dealing with "4" but with some other number?

Thanks so much!
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by aneesh.kg » Mon Oct 29, 2012 11:48 pm
ostrowskiamy wrote:Hi guys! Can anyone help me with this?

"Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 24, .82, 5.096 are three terminating decimals. If r and s are positive integers and the ratio r/s is expressed as a decimal, is r/s a terminating decimal?
1) 90 < r < 100
2) s = 4

I understand why it's not 1 (aka, eliminate answer "A" and "D" as correct) but why is the answer to this "B"? According to the back of the book: "Division by the number 4 must terminate: the remainder when dividing 4 must be 0, 1, 2, or 3, so the quotient must end with .0, .25, .5, or .75, respectively." I think I'm missing something obvious, but...I don't understand that last line! Can someone please explain this to me in a simpler way? How do I know it will never repeat, and will definitely terminate, for any number that I divide by 4, because of the ".0, .25, .5 or .75" ? If I test a bunch of numbers, is that what will happen and I just need to "know" that this is a rule that applies for 4? Or is there a rule I can use to scale out to other questions like this, where I'm not dealing with "4" but with some other number?

Thanks so much!
Let me try.
When you divide anything by 4, you're basically dividing that thing in four equal parts.

Let's take a rod of length 1 foot. When you divide it into four equal parts (same as performing 1/4), the length of each piece would be 0.25 feet.
If the rod were of length 2 feet, 3 feet and 4 feet, the lengths of each part would be 0.5 feet, 0.75 feet and 1 foot respectively.

Now let's take a BIG number.
Say 93.

What would 93/4 be?
Well, had the number been 92, I would divide it into 4 equal parts of 23 each. But now that I've a number that is 1 greater than 92, I would divide that 1 into equal parts of 0.25 and distribute them among each of 23s so that each of part is 23.25.

If you take 95, then it is 3 more than 92. This 3 can now be divided and distributed to make each piece of length 23.75.

This goes on for every integer.

Every integer, when being divided by 4 is either perfectly divisible by 4 or leaves a remainder of 1 or 2 or 3, which makes the resulting number ending with either no decimal, or a 0.25, or a 0.50 or a 0.75 respectively.

Did that help?
Aneesh Bangia
GMAT Math Coach
[email protected]

GMATPad:
Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/GMATPad
Join the discussion

by eaakbari » Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:24 am
Keep the below in mind as a general rule.

If a denominator has prime factors consisting of only 2 & 5, then the result will be a terminating decimal.

For e.g.

93/25 = 93 /(5*5) = 3.72 - terminating

93/20 = 93 / (2*2*5) = 4.65 - terminating

93/13 = 93 / (13) = some non-terminating decimal (try it)
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford
Join the discussion