BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Data sufficiency problem

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by lunarpower » Wed Jul 30, 2008 11:59 pm
first off, note that the conditions given in statements (1) and (2), individually, are identical. (i.e., if you flip the triangle around, statement 1 becomes statement 2, and vice versa.) that's a humble observation, but it serves to eliminate choices a and b in a hurry: if statement (1) is sufficient then statement (2) must be as well, and vice versa.

that leaves us with the last 3 choices.

you can visualize the fact that one of the two statements alone won't do the job:
imagine that statement (1) alone is true, making triangle QRS isosceles. that means segment QS is fixed in place.
however, there are no restrictions on triangle STU. that means, in effect, that we can move point U wherever we feel like moving it.
as we 'slide' point U along the bottom of the triangle, the value of x changes; therefore, statement (1) alone (and hence statement (2) alone) is insufficient.

if you don't buy the above argument, or if it's just something you'd never possibly think of within the time limit, then you could always try plugging in numbers and seeing that x can have different values.

--

statements (1) and (2) together:
since the triangle is a right triangle, we know that angles R and T must add to 90 degrees. let angle R be y degrees, and let angle T be (90 - y) degrees.
then
each of angles RQS and RSQ is (180 - y)/2 = 90 - y/2 degrees; and
each of angles TSU and TUS is (180 - (90 - y))/2 = 45 + y/2 degrees.
therefore, since angle RSQ, x, and angle TSU make a straight line together,
x = 180 - RSQ - TSU
= 180 - (90 - y/2) - (45 + y/2)
= 45 degrees.
sufficient
answer = c
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by lateraldeath » Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:24 am
oh wow, hm i don't think i'd have thought that far to it. But now i will, thanks for the help lunarpower, i hope i see a similar question in my test today.

OA is C
Join the discussion