BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Data Sufficiency-Inequalities

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by 4GMAT_Mumbai » Wed Apr 07, 2010 9:03 pm
Let me try putting it in words. Broadly - (1) Using example numbers or (2) sticking to abstract algebraic relationships.

PS: I am assuming the question says 1 / (a-b) and not (1/a)-b

1) Using example numbers.

i. Try taking numbers which are unrelated. eg., do not take a and b as 2 and 6. Take fairly unrelated numbers like 2 and 97.

ii. Try taking negative numbers. If they say a is a number, assume that a is -5.

iii. Try taking fractional numbers. If they say a is a number, assume that a is -3.5. More often, we make the mistake of assuming easy numbers and the question setter will try to exploit the pitfall here.

iv. Specifically here, take a = -2 and b = 3.5. The point which one will realize is that a-b is always a -ve number irrespective of the positivity or negativity of a and b. Once u hit this, the rest will fall in place.

v. modulus (a-b) > 1. Assume b to be, say 7. The point is that to satisfy this condition, a has to be < 6 or a has to be > 8. You will realize that this implies that the gap between a and b is greater than 1. There is no suggestion as to whether a is greater or b is greater

2) Sticking to abstract algaebraic relationships.

Using this will lead you to the conclusions of (iv) and (v) highlighted previously. Repeated practice with method (1) will help you reach these conclusions quicker and with more accuracy.

Remember that using algaebraic relationships is more often better.

Examples often come with the following pitfall: A rule may be true for a 1000 different numbers. But, there might be one number for which the rule is not satisfied. You have to be tremendously lucky to use that single number as an example.

I hope this helps. I am not sure if I have hit the nail on its head as the question was a little vague.
Join the discussion

by eaakbari » Wed Apr 07, 2010 9:44 pm
IMO A

Stem:

1/-(b-a) > b-a


If we think for what value of b-a can satisfy is when b-a = positive integer like say 3. We shall keep that in mind.

Statement one

If b>a lets get their difference b-a to a positive integer: (-3,-5) serve
See if following b>a can any numbers give you b-a as negative quantity as that wont satisfy.
No numbers like that
Hence Suff

Statement two
Tells us the difference is more than one. Does not help otherwise

Answer A.
Join the discussion

by dxgamez » Thu Apr 08, 2010 12:58 am
@eaakbari

When I saw statement 2, I was trying to figure out how should I remove the modulus. I was thinking of squaring the inequalities or doing cases for which the inequality exist (+ve or -ve).

When should we do the squaring to remove the modulus or the multiple possibilities?

I got this for st 2:-

|a - b| > 1

a - b > 1 or - (a - b) > 1

Thus insufficient cos the two inequalities can result in a few scenarios for question, right?
Join the discussion

by eaakbari » Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:11 am
dxgamez wrote:@eaakbari

When I saw statement 2, I was trying to figure out how should I remove the modulus. I was thinking of squaring the inequalities or doing cases for which the inequality exist (+ve or -ve).

When should we do the squaring to remove the modulus or the multiple possibilities?

I got this for st 2:-

|a - b| > 1

a - b > 1 or - (a - b) > 1

Thus insufficient cos the two inequalities can result in a few scenarios for question, right?
Your approach is definitely right. In this question, I did not go with squaring the modulus because the R.H.S was one , so no avail. If squaring the modulus gave me some expression which could be simplified then that would be the primary step.

Picking numbers and checking for statement two is not wrong but definitely time consuming and frankly cause statement one also required picking numbers , saving time is an important deal for this question

HTH
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford
Join the discussion