BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Cynics charge

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:10 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 7 times
by satishchandra » Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:52 am
Cynics charge that Major League Baseball lobbied for stadiums with fewer seats to
reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
A. lobbied for stadiums with fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
B. lobbied for stadiums with less seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
C. lobbied for stadiums that had fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
D. lobbied for stadiums that had less seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
E. lobbied for stadiums that had less seats as a means of reducing supply so they could
increase ticket prices.
[spoiler]OA: A; I thought 'C' was good.
What makes 'A' better than 'C'? [/spoiler]
This question has been posted many times but not many expects have looked at it
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:42 am
Thanked: 1 times

by mad2011 » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:46 am
satishchandra wrote:Cynics charge that Major League Baseball lobbied for stadiums with fewer seats to
reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
A. lobbied for stadiums with fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
B. lobbied for stadiums with less seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
C. lobbied for stadiums that had fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
D. lobbied for stadiums that had less seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
E. lobbied for stadiums that had less seats as a means of reducing supply so they could
increase ticket prices.
[spoiler]OA: A; I thought 'C' was good.
What makes 'A' better than 'C'? [/spoiler]
This question has been posted many times but not many expects have looked at it


IMO A is correct, In C tense is not correct.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 11:07 amFollowed by: 14 members
Thanked: 21 times
GMAT Score:750

by CappyAA » Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:28 am
Yeah, I think satishchandra is right - A is correct because the tense is off in C.

Saying "...that had fewer seats..." changes the meaning a little. It implies that there were fewer seats at these stadiums in the past, but there may no longer be fewer seats at them. A doesn't change the meaning of the sentence.
Taking the GMAT Again...PhD this time!

October 2008 Score: GMAT - 750 (50 Q, 41 V) :D

Manhattan GMAT 1 - 11/20/11 - 750 (50 Q, 42 V)
Manhattan GMAT 2 - 12/3/11 - 780 (51 Q, 45 V)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:55 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 2 times

by bpdulog » Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:14 am
Less is not appropriate since you can count the number of seats, so that kills B D and E.

C changes the meaning. It implies the MLB was lobbying for stadiums that already had fewer seats, when in fact they were lobbying for stadiums to contain fewer seats going forward.
NO EXCUSES

"Winston tastes good like a cigarette should."
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:20 am
satishchandra wrote:Cynics charge that Major League Baseball lobbied for stadiums with fewer seats to
reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
A. lobbied for stadiums with fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
B. lobbied for stadiums with less seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
C. lobbied for stadiums that had fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
D. lobbied for stadiums that had less seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
E. lobbied for stadiums that had less seats as a means of reducing supply so they could
increase ticket prices.
[spoiler]OA: A; I thought 'C' was good.
What makes 'A' better than 'C'? [/spoiler]
This question has been posted many times but not many expects have looked at it
In B, D and E, less cannot be used to refer to seats. Since the number of seats can be counted, the appropriate modifier is fewer. Eliminate B, D and E.

C changes the intended meaning: it implies that the stadiums already HAD fewer seats when Major League Baseball LOBBIED. Why would the league lobby for something that already existed? Eliminate C.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:10 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 7 times

by satishchandra » Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:33 am
Not so convinced yet. :(
Can somebody explain how the meaning would change probably by giving some examples.
Had it been given as "lobbied for stadiums that have fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices", would it have been right option to pick?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:50 am
satishchandra wrote:Not so convinced yet. :(
Can somebody explain how the meaning would change probably by giving some examples.
Had it been given as "lobbied for stadiums that have fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices", would it have been right option to pick?
The league WANTED stadiums with fewer seats; thus, in saying that the stadiums already HAD fewer seats, C does not convey the intended meaning.

The following would convey the proper sequence of events: the league lobbied for stadiums that WOULD HAVE fewer seats.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1