BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Cyclists

Expert replies
by Vemuri » Sun Mar 01, 2009 5:18 pm
Touring professional cyclists have been shown to have between 4 and 11 percent body fat. If we could all decrease our body fat to that level, we could all cycle at a world-class level.

Which statement(s) below accurately describe the flaw in the method of reasoning used in the above argument?

I. It assumes a causal relationship between two highly correlated events.
II. It suggestss that low body fat is a sufficient condition rather than a necessary condition for becoming a world-class cyclist.
III. Its conclusion is based on evidence which, in turn, is based on its conclusion.

A. I only
B. II only
C. I & II only
D. II & III only
E. All of the above
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Jatinder » Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:05 pm
I reckon A..

II- it assumes that 4-11 % body fat is necessary and sufficient
III- No circular reasoning here.
Keep flying
Join the discussion

by arjunn7 » Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:35 pm
IMO B..

Dude ( the person replied above )
the ques asks us to find the flawed assumption.. n The II statement gives us that..
Work Hard till You succeed.. N even after that..!!
Join the discussion

by delhiboy1979 » Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:33 am
I too would go with B although I cant make much sense of the third option.
Join the discussion

C

by poonam1279 » Mon Mar 02, 2009 7:12 am
IMO C
GMAT PREP 2-630
MGMAT (2):630
Join the discussion

by vanessa.m » Sat May 14, 2016 2:44 am
I'm pretty confident that B is correct answer.
Join the discussion