BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Cube-->Cuboid

Expert replies
by harsh.champ » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:01 pm
78 identical cubes each with 2 cm edge are joined together to form a cuboid. If the perimeter of the base of the cuboid is 64 cm, then the number of cubes along the height of the cuboid is

(A)3
(B)6
(C)2
(D)4
(E)Cannot be determined

The correct answer is C.
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by shashank.ism » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:06 pm
harsh.champ wrote:78 identical cubes each with 2 cm edge are joined together to form a cuboid. If the perimeter of the base of the cuboid is 64 cm, then the number of cubes along the height of the cuboid is

(A)3
(B)6
(C)2
(D)4
(E)Cannot be determined

The correct answer is C.

Let A & B be the no. of cubes on side of cuboid and C be the no. on height of cuboid
so total no = A*B*C = 78
Also perimeter = 64
--> 2 (2A+2B) = 64
--> A+B =16
Now 78 = 13* 3*2 on factorization
and 13+3 =16 so C=2

Hence,The correct answer is C.[/quote]
Last edited by shashank.ism on Sun Feb 07, 2010 2:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My Websites:
www.mba.webmaggu.com - India's social Network for MBA Aspirants

www.deal.webmaggu.com -India's online discount, coupon, free stuff informer.

www.dictionary.webmaggu.com - A compact free online dictionary with images.

Nothing is Impossible, even Impossible says I'm possible.
Join the discussion

by ajith » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:40 pm
harsh.champ wrote:78 identical cubes each with 2 cm edge are joined together to form a cuboid. If the perimeter of the base of the cuboid is 64 cm, then the number of cubes along the height of the cuboid is

(A)3
(B)6
(C)2
(D)4
(E)Cannot be determined

The correct answer is C.

say a,b,c are the num of the cubes on the each of the side of the cuboid

abc =78
a+b = 16

abc = 13*2*3

since a,b,c all are integers

a =13, b =3 and c =2 is one solution
a =3, b =13 and c =2 us another
c=2 in any case
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by onedayi'll » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:56 pm
shashank.ism wrote:
harsh.champ wrote:78 identical cubes each with 2 cm edge are joined together to form a cuboid. If the perimeter of the base of the cuboid is 64 cm, then the number of cubes along the height of the cuboid is

(A)3
(B)6
(C)2
(D)4
(E)Cannot be determined

The correct answer is C.
The correct answer is C.
[/quote]


shashank.ism,

You're not providing any explanation just writing the correct answer....
That's looks like you're doing copy and paste.

I think its not the proper way.
Join the discussion

by onedayi'll » Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:03 pm
ajith wrote:
harsh.champ wrote:78 identical cubes each with 2 cm edge are joined together to form a cuboid. If the perimeter of the base of the cuboid is 64 cm, then the number of cubes along the height of the cuboid is

(A)3
(B)6
(C)2
(D)4
(E)Cannot be determined

The correct answer is C.

say a,b,c are the num of the cubes on the each of the side of the cuboid

abc =78
a+b = 16

abc = 13*2*3

since a,b,c all are integers

a =13, b =3 and c =2 is one solution
a =3, b =13 and c =2 us another
c=2 in any case



Hi,

How did u got a+b = 16?
Join the discussion

by ajith » Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:05 pm
onedayi'll wrote:
ajith wrote:
harsh.champ wrote:78 identical cubes each with 2 cm edge are joined together to form a cuboid. If the perimeter of the base of the cuboid is 64 cm, then the number of cubes along the height of the cuboid is

(A)3
(B)6
(C)2
(D)4
(E)Cannot be determined

The correct answer is C.

say a,b,c are the num of the cubes on the each of the side of the cuboid

abc =78
a+b = 16

abc = 13*2*3

since a,b,c all are integers

a =13, b =3 and c =2 is one solution
a =3, b =13 and c =2 us another
c=2 in any case



Hi,

How did u got a+b = 16?
Perimeter =64 cm and each cube has 2cm breadth

so 2*a*2cm+2*b*2cm =64
4(a+b) =64
a+b = 16
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion