BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Crtitical reasoning doubt

Expert replies
by hellother » Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:44 am
I have read in many books to assume what the author believes to be true , for a conclusion to be right before reading the answer choices.
But is this necessary for "strengthen" and "weaken" questions ?Can't we just find an answer choice that weakens the conclusion , which can actually be spotted from the argument , rather than thinking of assumptions and try to find an answer choice that makes the assumption invalid ?

Please reply.
Join the discussion
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

by adthedaddy » Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:13 pm
Dear hellother,

The main purpose is to get the answer - roads can be many. You select the one which you're comfortable with.

For example, read following CR question -

Insect infestations in certain cotton-growing regions of the world have caused dramatic increases in the price of cotton on the world market. By contrast, the price of soybeans has long remained stable. Knowing that cotton plants mature quickly, many soybean growers in Ortovia plan to cease growing soybeans and begin raising cotton instead, thereby taking advantage of the high price of cotton to increase their income significantly, at least over the next several years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the plan's chances for success?

(A) The cost of raising soybeans has increased significantly over the past several years and is expected to continue to climb.
(B) Tests of a newly developed, inexpensive pesticide have shown it to be both environmentally safe and effective against the insects that have infested cotton crops.
(C) In the past several years, there has been no sharp increase in the demand for cotton and for goods made out of cotton.
(D) Few consumers would be willing to pay significantly higher prices for cotton goods than they are now paying.
(E) The species of insect that has infested cotton plants has never been known to attack soybean plants.


Here, we have to find an option which weakens the argument.

Taking the options one by one, following procedure helps eliminate the options one by one. In the end you are left with a choice from either B or C. Then you have to read both of them carefully and decide which one weakens the argument more.

As per the passage, what is the plan ? - To grow cotton instead of Soyabean to reap profits.

A: Strengthens (as this encourages the farmer to grow cotton & go as per plan)
B: Weakens (As a cheap pesticide will kill the insects that infested Cotton, it will bring the prices of Cotton down very soon. So the plan to grow cotton may not prove to be a successful one.)
C: Weakens (As this may bring down the price of cotton and discourage the farmer to grow cotton as per his plan.)
D: Strengthens (as this encourages the farmer to grow cotton & go as per plan)
E: Strengthens (as this would keep the prices of Soyabean low. Thus farmer would not be encouraged to grow Soyabean)

From above arguments, comparatively, B weakens the argument more than C.
Thus ans is B
Hope this has helped you and answered your question.
Join the discussion