Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Critical Reasoning

Expert replies
by RiyaR » Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:03 pm
176. Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply.
Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in 1994.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's explanation?
(A) In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold.
(B) In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville.
(C) Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount on certain nights of the week.
(D) People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a theater.
(E) People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends

Why is the answer e and not A?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by [email protected] » Sun Oct 19, 2014 10:39 pm
Hi RiyaR,

In these types of "conversation prompts", you have to be very careful to focus on the specific points that the two people agree on and disagree on. The question asks us to Weaken Brad's objection, so we have to be clear on Brad's POINT (so that we can weaken/attack it).

Jennifer and Brad seem to agree that 10,000 fewer video rentals occurred in 1994 than in 1993. They also agree that Videorama (the new store) did some business (including SELLING videos). Brad's point is that the 4,000 videos that Videorama SOLD could NOT have accounted for 10,000 fewer rentals overall. THAT is the point that we need to counter. If we can find a way to show that 4,000 videos COULD have led to 10,000 fewer rentals, then his argument would be weakened.

Since you narrowed the options down to A and E, I'll focus on those.

Answer A: Videorama rented more videos than it sold. This is a tempting answer, but here's the problem: we don't know how MANY more. This wording implies that Videorama could have rented out 4,001 videos; combined with the 4,000 sold videos, we don't necessarily have a situation that descrease the total number of rentals by 10,000.

Answer E: People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends. According to this, if each of the 4,000 videos was FREQUENTLY loaned out to friends (who would have otherwise rented the videos), then we could very easily decrease the number of rentals by 10,000 (or more).

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion