BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Crimes- argument against

Expert replies
by kanha81 » Tue May 19, 2009 7:39 pm
Crimes are mainly committed by the young, and for this reason merely increasing the number of police officers or expenditures on police services has little effect on reducing the crime rate. In fact, the only factor associated with a crime-rate drop is a decrease in the number of people in the community aged fourteen to thirty.

The findings above can best serve as part of an argument against

(A) the likelihood that any law enforcement program will be effective in reducing the crime rate within a short time

(B) increasing prison terms for young people found guilty of crimes

(C) introducing compulsory military conscription for people aged seventeen to nineteen

(D) raising the age at which students are permitted to leave school

(E) a community’s plan to increase the number of recreational and educational activities in which young adults can participate

Explain your answers.
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by anksgupta » Tue May 19, 2009 7:47 pm
IMO A

The premise says that police forces and expenditure on them is needless as crime can only be mitigated by decrease in the number of people in the community aged fourteen to thirty.

A: goes directly with premise showing disregard to law enforcement programme

B: It supports authors claim

C: Not relevant

D: Not relevant

E: Will support the author
Join the discussion

Re: Crimes- argument against

by vinaynp » Tue May 19, 2009 7:53 pm
kanha81 wrote:Crimes are mainly committed by the young, and for this reason merely increasing the number of police officers or expenditures on police services has little effect on reducing the crime rate. In fact, the only factor associated with a crime-rate drop is a decrease in the number of people in the community aged fourteen to thirty.

The findings above can best serve as part of an argument against

(A) the likelihood that any law enforcement program will be effective in reducing the crime rate within a short time

(B) increasing prison terms for young people found guilty of crimes

(C) introducing compulsory military conscription for people aged seventeen to nineteen

(D) raising the age at which students are permitted to leave school

(E) a community’s plan to increase the number of recreational and educational activities in which young adults can participate

Explain your answers.
(Increasing the number of police officers or expenditures on police services) = Law enforcement program [LEP]

LEP has no effect on reducing the crimes. Hence, we should not be using LEP for reducing crimes.

IMO A
Join the discussion

by kanha81 » Tue May 19, 2009 7:57 pm
OA is [spoiler][A][/spoiler]

I had a tough time understanding the question as it said which one would argue against the agrument?

How can this question be better framed, if you know what I am trying to say?

Thanks a bunch.
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Join the discussion

by mason77 » Sun May 15, 2016 2:24 pm
I believe the correct answer should be A.
Join the discussion