Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

crime rate

Expert replies
by nervesofsteel » Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:17 pm
In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

IMO ans should be C

but OA is A

Please explain...
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by relic » Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:51 am
Hmm, what is the author of the argument concluding? She is concluding that the action (eliminating access to college classes) will not result in the governor's hope of a reduced crime rate. Or, to put it another way, that the action will result in a similar or increased crime rate.

She has based this conclusion on the fact that released inmates who have taken such classes commit fewer crimes than released inmates who did not take such classes. She is assuming that these classes prevent more crime than they cause (perhaps some people's only opportunity to take such classes is while in prison).

Answer C is tricky because it seems to promote a causal relationship the author wants. But again, even if taking a class makes inmates less likely to commit further crimes doesn't matter if others are committing crimes just to take the classes.

The correct answer, A, awkwardly states the author's assumption that people aren't committing crimes just for the opportunity to take college-level classes.
Relic Tutoring

Free GMAT advice and strategies at https://relictutoring.blocked/
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:57 am
Here is my understanding.
Conclusion of the argument:
Gov's current action will counter his/her's ultimate goal (reduction in crime).

Argument:
make prison exp harsher by denying inmates access to college-level courses.

So the assumption is the gov thinks college level courses are a luxury and has no impact on the prisoner's crime behaviour after their release.
This is what A explains.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:50 pm
NervesofSteel,
I am with u on this.

Check out Ian's explanation here:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/tough-assump ... 32980.html
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:41 pm
cramya wrote:NervesofSteel,
I am with u on this.

Check out Ian's explanation here:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/tough-assump ... 32980.html

Thanks Cramya
Join the discussion

by graem83d » Sun May 15, 2016 3:17 am
So I feel A is a better option
Join the discussion