Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Crime Rate

Expert replies
by ashg84 » Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:05 am
Newspaper Editorial

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals an making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college level course. However, this actions is clearly counter to the governor's ultimate goal, since after being released from prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is the assumption on which argument depends
a) Not being able to take college - level course while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed
b) Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
c) The group of inmates who chose to take college - level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
d)Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate's subsequent behavious than taking college - level courses does.
e) The governor's ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

Please explain with your answer
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ice_rush » Fri Oct 05, 2012 8:30 am
[spoiler](C)[/spoiler] should be correct here. If the group of inmates who took college level courses were already less likely to commit crime then the governor's argument does not hold true.
Join the discussion

by ashg84 » Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:06 pm
I also picked Choice C but the OA - A
Not sure how??
Join the discussion

by Mission2012 » Fri Oct 05, 2012 8:51 pm
What is the source of the question
If you find my post useful -> please click on "Thanks"
Join the discussion

by ashg84 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 12:32 am
from past GMAT question paper ..
Join the discussion

by anirudh.n » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:15 am
I was also confused between A and C. But i selected A over C.

If you closely see the conclusion of he argument, it states the contrary to the governor's plan-to deny access for college education after the inmates are released.

Option C merely supports the governor's plan saying that the group of inmates who were about to take college level courses after being released were not already less likely(maybe more likely or equally likely) to commit crime than others who dint want to take the course.

But option A on the other hand says that if the governor plan is put into the program, the event of not taking a college level course is unlikely to deter anyone from committing a crime that he or she might have committed anyway.so even if the plan is put into the program, the crimes after the inmates are released will continue to occur. Hence the plan is unwarranted.

Thanks,
Ani
Join the discussion

by ashg84 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:02 am
In my view, the conclusion is that Governor action to deny college education is not correct. i.e college education will help reduce the crime rate. So using the denial test on options, i zeroed down to option C.
Option A is weaken the argument
Join the discussion

by akashkumar1987 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:51 pm
Is the answer 'A'.

Assumption is something that is not stated in the premises.

In this question we have cause and effect ... prison conditions harsher -> reduce the crime rate

A - So we will go with this.
B - We are comparing with general population.we dont have ny info about them so out of scope
C - This is already stated in last line
D - We dont know nything bout school level courses
E - Out of scope as nothing has been said like this in premises

Please let me know if my reasoning is correct or not.
Join the discussion

by Newbie_FastLearner » Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:33 am
Guys, check out Ian's explanation

https://www.beatthegmat.com/tough-assump ... 80-15.html


OA is C.
Join the discussion