BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Cricketers

Expert replies
by peelamedu » Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:59 pm
Elbow pads and visors worn by cricketers are yet another example that proves how much attention the game receives today. After all, players of 70's did not need such protection, even during the days of bodyline bowling, considered vicious in it's own right.

The presenter of this argument has raised a justifiable objection for all possible reasons EXCEPT:

A. There was more camaraderie on field in the 70's
B. Playing conditions have become more competitive.
C. Fielding positions were less rigid.
D. The players of the 70s were far gutsier
E. Bodyline bowling has been banned since the 70's.

I don't have the OA answer and have chosen option A.
Your answers please with explanation.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by abhishek.pati » Wed Jun 15, 2011 7:25 am
IMo A

Need an expert explanation for the same...!!!
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Wed Jun 15, 2011 7:45 am
Hi,
After all, players of 70's did not need such protection because:
1)There was more camaraderie on field in the 70's
2)Fielding positions were less rigid.
3)The players of the 70s were far gutsier

Players of this generation need pads because:
Playing conditions have become more competitive.

All the 4 reasons could be used to reason out why cricketers need pads now while they didn't need earlier.
But, E states :" Bodyline bowling has been banned since the 70's. " So, the threat has decreased. So, cricketers do not need pads to protect them.

Hence, E

Any chance of getting OA?
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by mobileuser » Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:55 am
I agree with Frankenstein regarding the explanation. Basically, we're looking at the choice which supports the argument that the game receives much attention today. The answer is therefore E
Join the discussion

by peelamedu » Wed Jun 15, 2011 9:25 pm
OA is E.

I must have been carried away by "has raised a justifiable objection for all possible reasons EXCEPT".

Could the experts explain.
'Possible reasons' for what ? I thought it was about the game receiving so much attention nowadays.
Join the discussion

by cyrwr1 » Thu Jun 16, 2011 7:17 am
The questions is asking which would be a reason for the games to NOT involve paddings by the players even though the 70s included bodyline bowling(physical aspect).

a)more lenience between athletes
b)harsher conditions
c)Field less rigid
d)gutsier players
e)Bodyline Bowling has been banned since the 70s

E stands out.
Join the discussion

by Sanjay2706 » Tue Jun 21, 2011 10:55 pm
IMO E.
Bit surprised to see a cricket question on the GMAT. :)
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:22 pm
This question isn't even in English. The sentence "The presenter of this argument has raised a justifiable objection for all possible reasons" is completely meaningless. The word "70s" should have 'the' in front of it; "it's" should not have an apostrophe; etc, etc, etc. This is frankly one of the worst written practice questions I've ever seen, and I've seen a lot of them. There isn't much point debating the 'correct answer' to a question that doesn't make any sense to begin with. I'd be curious to know where it's from, but I'd also strongly recommend working from better quality materials.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion