BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

CR1

Expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by hardik.jadeja » Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:12 am
IMO B

A) out of scope
B) Correct.
C) argument relating to non-violent crime is out of scope
D) Argument doesnt say anything about in-house rehab programs.
E) Out of scope.

The argument is similar to this one:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/driving-offense-t56478.html
Join the discussion

by jube » Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:47 am
Yep, B.

Drug users who commit crime should either:
1. be given stricter punishments
2. undergo rehab --> this should happen only if this option will deter that person from committing crime again

Research shows that people who undergo rehab do not not commit crime again.

Therefore, drug users who commit crime should be given stricter punishments.
Join the discussion

by outreach » Sun Jun 13, 2010 9:49 am
B should be corect
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:15 am
Shawshank wrote:hi,

please provide your answers and explanations
B here too
Join the discussion

by Gyan » Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:49 am
IMO B
Join the discussion

by Shawshank » Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:26 am
OA - B
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...
Join the discussion

by haveto » Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:32 pm
it is B.
Join the discussion