BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR Weaken 1

Expert replies
by ranjeet75 » Wed May 04, 2011 6:39 am
Farmers in developing countries claim that the United States government, through farm subsidies, is responsible for the artificially low global price of wheat. Because the U.S. government buys whatever wheat American farmers are unable to sell on the open market, American farmers have no incentive to modulate the size of their crops according to the needs of the global market. As a result, American farmers routinely produce more wheat than the global market can absorb and the global price of wheat is kept low. Without these subsidies, the farmers in developing economies claim, American farmers would produce only the amount of wheat that they could sell on the open market and the global price of wheat would rise.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the claims of the farmers in developing countries regarding the price of wheat?

"¢ Wheat that is not processed for consumption is often used for certain industrial applications.
"¢ Non-governmental buyers of wheat and wheat products are able to predict how much wheat they will need several years in advance.
"¢ The United States government offers similar subsidies to soybean farmers, though the global price of soybeans is significantly higher than that of wheat.
"¢ Other countries, such as Canada and Russia, are likely to produce more wheat if the United States were to reduce its output.
"¢ The price of sorghum, a crop for which the United States government offers no subsidies, is lower than that of wheat.

The OA is [spoiler]D[/spoiler]

My ques is why C is wrong as this is a weaken question and we can take any outside information true.

and in C the soyabean prices are compared with the wheat prices which should not be wrong in Weaken Type ques.

Please clarify
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by HSPA » Wed May 04, 2011 6:51 am
I would have definitly selected C if the text in double quotes is not there

The United States government offers similar subsidies to soybean farmers, though the global price of soybeans is significantly higher "than that of wheat".
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by ranjeet75 » Wed May 04, 2011 7:52 am
I could not understand what role "than that of wheat" play for determining C wrong
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Wed May 04, 2011 8:38 am
I tried my best

Conclusion : Farm subsidies by govt of united states is responsible for low prices of wheat
Premise 1: Govt will buy excess wheat produced
Premise 2: Farmers' production is more than demand ( price will fall )
Premise 3: No subsidy => less production => high cost and profits

Good weakner: US govt provide similar subsidy for soy beans but their cost havent declined.
=> subsidy has no impact on cost of Soy => subsidy has no impact on wheat.

Does the third world farmers produce soybean???
The demand for soybean is not falling so US soy farmers might have monopoly?

Soy cost lot more than wheat. So a 10% drop in soy might not be significant while the same drop in wheat is significant.
Best business sells its products for 100% margin.
Let wheat production cost = 5 ;sold at = 10 - (10% of 10) = 9 ; profit = 4
Let soy production cost = 20; sold at = 40 - 4 ; 16 is the profit
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by GMATMadeEasy » Thu May 05, 2011 3:28 am
@HSPA:
Good weakner: US govt provide similar subsidy for soy beans but their cost havent declined.
=> subsidy has no impact on cost of Soy => subsidy has no impact on wheat.
You are ASSUMING as if Soya has the same situation as Wheat. We do NOT know that. These are two different prodcuts and you can NOT compare thier prices. What if he gives the same exapple for Almond that is very expensive in all countries.

You find this case as a weakener by thinkig that a similar cause/situation not producing effect will weaken right . You are right in your reasoning but the only difference is that situation is NOT similar here. (Soya and wheat comparison not same)
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Thu May 05, 2011 3:56 am
GMATMadeEasy wrote:@HSPA:
Good weakner: US govt provide similar subsidy for soy beans but their cost havent declined.
=> subsidy has no impact on cost of Soy => subsidy has no impact on wheat.
You are ASSUMING as if Soya has the same situation as Wheat. We do NOT know that. These are two different prodcuts and you can NOT compare thier prices. What if he gives the same exapple for Almond that is very expensive in all countries.

You find this case as a weakener by thinkig that a similar cause/situation not producing effect will weaken right . You are right in your reasoning but the only difference is that situation is NOT similar here. (Soya and wheat comparison not same)
It's not that C is wrong - C is indeed a weakener - it's just not a very strong weakening case, as we have no idea what else is different between wheat and soy. C is what we call a "second best" - it goes in the right direction, but requires further assumptions or "steps" to weaken the conclusion, whereas D weakens it directly - D says that if the US were to stop doing what it's doing, other countries will step in and replace it, so the same status quo will remain and wheat prices will not grow.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by GMATMadeEasy » Thu May 05, 2011 4:45 am
@Geva: The option C compares price of Soya to price of wheat. Isn't this information in itself sufficent to make it OUT of SCOPE ? How could we compare global price of Soya to global price of wheat when these are two different things at least with respect to the current argument.

Author is not comparing decline in the price but absolute prices of two different products . I can definitely be wrong but that was my reasoing for this. Please clarify in case I am missing something hre.
Join the discussion

by cyrwr1 » Thu May 05, 2011 7:06 pm
As Geva said, the argument is:

US subsidies increase production--->> causing a drop in price

What weakens this?

If US does not increase production, there were will other reasons that production will still increase.

D is the answer.


Just my thought, after reading the stimulus/stem, do not immediately go to the choices. Think for a sec, what alternatives/reasons the conclusion is weak?
Join the discussion