haidgmat wrote:Can someone explain this to me?

In a certain wildlife park, park rangers are able to track the movements of many rhinoceroses because those animals wear radio collars. When, as often happens, a collar snips off, it is put back on. Putting a collar on a rhinoceros involves immobilizing the animal by shooting it with a tranquilizer dart. Female rhinoceroses that have been frequently recollared have significantly lower fertility rates than uncollared females. Probably, therefore, some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility.

In evaluating the argument, it would be most useful to determine which of the following?

A. Whether there are more collared female rhinoceroses than uncollared female rhinoceroses in the park.-We are talking about recollared animals so comparing the numbers of collared v/s uncollared is immaterial.

B. How the tranquilizer that is used for immobilizing rhinoceroses differs, if at all, from tranquilizers used in working with other large mammals.-There is no talk of other mammals anywhere in the question.

C. How often park rangers need to use tranquilizer darts to immobilize rhinoceroses for reasons other than attaching radio collars-The only statement pertaining to the argument.

D. Whether male rhinoceroses in the wildlife park lose their collars any more often than the park's female rhinoceroses do-There is no intended comparison between male and female rhinoceros.We are only comparing between females.

E. Whether radio collars are the only practical means that park rangers have for tracking the movements of rhinoceroses in the park.-Nowhere in the argument is there any talk of comparing the means of tracking the movements of rhinos.We are only interested in knowing the effect of the tranquilizer darts on their fertility.

OA: C