CR

Expert replies

ruplun: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 232; Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:09 amFollowed by: 2 members; Thanked: 1 times

by ruplun » Mon Aug 30, 2010 8:41 am

Top college graduates are having more difficulty demonstrating their superiority to prospective employers than did the top students of twenty years ago when an honors degree was distinction enough. Today's employers are less impressed with the honors degree. Twenty years ago no more than 10 percent of a given class graduated with honors. Today, however, because of grade inflation, the honors degree goes to more than 50 percent of a graduating class. Therefore, to restore confidence in the degrees they award, colleges must take steps to control grade inflation.

Which one of the following is an assumption that, if true, would support the conclusion in the passage?

(A) Today's students are not higher achievers than the students of twenty years ago.
(B) Awarding too many honors degrees causes colleges to inflate grades.
(C) Today's employers rely on honors ranking in making their hiring decisions.
(D) It is not easy for students with low grades to obtain jobs.
(E) Colleges must make employers aware of the criteria used to determine who receives an honors degree

please let me know the solution for this...

i think the ans is A

Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning | Mon Aug 30, 2010 8:41 am

beatthegmatinsept: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 422; Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:47 amFollowed by: 1 member; Thanked: 22 times; GMAT Score:680

by beatthegmatinsept » Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:28 am

IMO B. Let me know if that's the OA, and i'll give you my reasoning behind it.

Being defeated is often only a temporary condition. Giving up is what makes it permanent.

FightWithGMAT: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 364; Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:13 amFollowed by: 3 members; Thanked: 31 times

by FightWithGMAT » Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:35 am

ruplun wrote:Top college graduates are having more difficulty demonstrating their superiority to prospective employers than did the top students of twenty years ago when an honors degree was distinction enough. Today's employers are less impressed with the honors degree. Twenty years ago no more than 10 percent of a given class graduated with honors. Today, however, because of grade inflation, the honors degree goes to more than 50 percent of a graduating class. Therefore, to restore confidence in the degrees they award, colleges must take steps to control grade inflation.

Which one of the following is an assumption that, if true, would support the conclusion in the passage?

(A) Today's students are not higher achievers than the students of twenty years ago.
(B) Awarding too many honors degrees causes colleges to inflate grades.
(C) Today's employers rely on honors ranking in making their hiring decisions.
(D) It is not easy for students with low grades to obtain jobs.
(E) Colleges must make employers aware of the criteria used to determine who receives an honors degree

please let me know the solution for this...

i think the ans is A

IMO A

How it can be B?

Weird casual relationship which does not demand any bridge.

Infact the scenario is reverse..

inflation in grades causes more honors degrees.

Gmat_War: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 41; Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:19 pm; Thanked: 2 times

by Gmat_War » Mon Aug 30, 2010 11:09 am

IMO B.
This question is a case of scope shift.The scope shifts from employers not providing jobs to honors students to grade inflation in colleges.
Finally the conclusion states that to restore confidence in the degrees they award, colleges must take steps to control grade inflation.
We need to find an assumption based on this conclusion.

Statement B draws light on that stating Awarding too many honors degrees causes colleges to inflate grades.
A,D,E does not throw light on that aspect.Even if you remove these statements,it does not have any bearing on the conclusion.
C would have been the answer if the conclusion had a relation with employers providing jobs and honors students.
What is the OA

RyanDark: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 62; Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:54 pmFollowed by: 1 member; Location: Pittsburgh,PA; Thanked: 4 times

by RyanDark » Mon Aug 30, 2010 11:24 am

I think its B.
CDE can be eliminated due to other reasons. Narrowing down to A and B.
I think A is wrong because the argument is not dealing with achievements or current age student's abilities. Infact the fact -50 percent of class graduates with honors - states that current students are more capable.
So the situation is -more is bad.B is near to this.

diebeatsthegmat: Legendary Member; Posts: 1119; Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 amFollowed by: 3 members; Thanked: 29 times

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Aug 30, 2010 11:30 pm

ruplun wrote:Top college graduates are having more difficulty demonstrating their superiority to prospective employers than did the top students of twenty years ago when an honors degree was distinction enough. Today's employers are less impressed with the honors degree. Twenty years ago no more than 10 percent of a given class graduated with honors. Today, however, because of grade inflation, the honors degree goes to more than 50 percent of a graduating class. Therefore, to restore confidence in the degrees they award, colleges must take steps to control grade inflation.

Which one of the following is an assumption that, if true, would support the conclusion in the passage?

(A) Today's students are not higher achievers than the students of twenty years ago.
(B) Awarding too many honors degrees causes colleges to inflate grades.
(C) Today's employers rely on honors ranking in making their hiring decisions.
(D) It is not easy for students with low grades to obtain jobs.
(E) Colleges must make employers aware of the criteria used to determine who receives an honors degree

please let me know the solution for this...

i think the ans is A

i think the answer choice should be B instead of A
the main point the argument is not to compare the grade between current students and students 20 years ago.

GMAT Course Reviews

563 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (563 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review