BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR - Some communities in Florida

Expert replies
by SubratGmat2011 » Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:07 pm
Some communities in Florida are populated almost exclusively by retired people and contain few, if any,
families with small children. Yet these communities are home to thriving businesses specializing in the rental
of furniture for infants and small children.
Which of the following, if true, best reconciles the seeming discrepancy described above?
(A) The businesses specializing in the rental of children's furniture buy their furniture from distributors outside
of Florida.
(B) The few children who do reside in these communities all know each other and often make overnight visits
to one another's houses.
(C) Many residents of these communities who move frequently prefer renting their furniture to buying it
outright.
(D) Many residents of these communities must provide for the needs of visiting grandchildren several weeks a
year.
(E) Children's furniture available for rental is of the same quality as that available for sale in the stores.

Can someone plz help me out to understand the question clearly and the answer for this question?, It is bit confusing for me.

OA - D
source - OG - 10
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by this_time_i_will » Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:47 pm
this one is straightforward. D is right answer.
Members may help u out if u can point out ur exact doubt.
Join the discussion

by ashish2104 » Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:18 pm
Simply D.

What can cause an increase in rentals for furnitures for childern when there are few in florida?
If we have influx of children from outside florida(read grandchildren) then we can exlain the reason of the increase in sales.


Hope this helps.
Join the discussion

by goyalsau » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:58 pm
one more D
Join the discussion

by jain2016 » Tue May 10, 2016 9:04 am
Hi Experts ,

Can you please explain B? Why option B is wrong?

Please explain.

Many thanks in advance.

SJ
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Tue May 10, 2016 10:20 am
jain2016 wrote:Hi Experts ,

Can you please explain B? Why option B is wrong?

Please explain.

Many thanks in advance.

SJ
We're trying to reconcile the following incongruity: very few children live in a community where vendors that rent children's furniture are thriving.

Our job is to figure out why people in this community would be renting a lot of children's furniture when not that many children live there.

Answer choice B doesn't explain this. Use a simple example to illustrate: Imagine that there are 100 homes in a community, and, say, 2 or 3 of those homes have children living there. Would it really matter if those kids often spent the night at each other's homes? Presumably any homes with young children would already have children's furniture. And even if they needed to rent something when a neighborhood child spent the night, we're still only talking about a few homes in the community - not exactly a recipe for a thriving business.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion