BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR - recent article

Expert replies
by SubratGmat2011 » Sun Sep 26, 2010 6:40 pm
A recent article stated that only 5.5% of American colleges grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts.
Citing this, a reader wrote to lament that this was further evidence of the decline of academic rigor in American
post high school education. Which of the following is an assumption on the part of the reader?
"¢ The percentage of American colleges granting liberal arts degrees would continue to drop.
"¢ All colleges should grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts.
"¢ Most post-secondary scientific, engineering, and vocational training does not involve as much academic rigor as
liberal arts training.
"¢ Academic rigor is the most important aspect of post high school education.
"¢ Of the colleges that do not grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts, many granted fewer than a
quarter of their degrees in the liberal arts.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by goyalsau » Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:23 pm
SubratGmat2011 wrote:
A recent article stated that only 5.5% of American colleges grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts.Citing this, a reader wrote to lament that this was further evidence of the decline of academic rigor in American post high school education.

Which of the following is an assumption on the part of the reader?

"¢ The percentage of American colleges granting liberal arts degrees would continue to drop.

"¢ All colleges should grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts.

"¢ Most post-secondary scientific, engineering, and vocational training does not involve as much academic rigor as
liberal arts training.

"¢ Academic rigor is the most important aspect of post high school education.

"¢ Of the colleges that do not grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts, many granted fewer than a
quarter of their degrees in the liberal arts.
C and E are the contenders.

I think its C

Because If Most post-secondary scientific, engineering, and vocational training does involve as much academic rigor as
liberal arts training. Then the argument is weakened.
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:56 pm
E it is. We don't care about other kinds of studies
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by ov25 » Mon Sep 27, 2010 10:16 am
I agree with goyal...C
Join the discussion

by vishalj » Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:13 pm
IMO C

In the conclusion, the new word "academic rigor" is used, which is drawn after the statictis of "liberal arts". C is the defender choice simply saying that non liberal arts training such as scientific, engineering,etc does not involve the same academic rigor. When use the negation, it will read as "Most post-secondary scientific, engineering, and vocational training does involve as much academic rigor as liberal arts training", which means that for the remaining 94.5% of American colleges, the decline in academic rigor is not visible.

E is actually weakening the answer choice. Many of the remaining 94.5% colleges that do not grant liberal arts degree offer 25% of their degree in the liberal arts. By providing this evidence, we are underming the conclusion by saying that the author's interpretation was not correct.
Join the discussion

by saurabhmahajan » Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:45 pm
IMO: C
reply2spg: E it is. We don't care about other kinds of studies
its true that we dont care about other type of studies but then it shows that there no decline of academic rigor.
Thanks and regards,
Saurabh Mahajan

I can understand you not winning,but i will not forgive you for not trying.
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:51 pm
reply2spg wrote:E it is. We don't care about other kinds of studies
if we consider this kind of question as support type, C makes sense and E seems not to relevant much
Join the discussion

by g000fy » Tue Sep 28, 2010 10:02 am
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:17 pm
IMO C
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion