A recent university study indicated that students who receive full scholarships tend to maintain higher grade point averages than do students who must take out loans or work to finance school. The study concluded that scholarships enable students to achieve high grade point averages by alleviating the stress related to financial concerns and freeing up students' time to study more.
The study's conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A)Students who take out loans maintain higher grade point averages than those who work to finance school.
(B)Finance-related stress affects student performance in a manner similar to that of restricted study time.
(C)Students who must work to pay for their studies cannot maintain high grade point averages.
(D)High grade point averages were not the primary criterion upon which the scholarship awards were based.
(E)Controlling stress level is less important to student performance than is intensive studying.
Anyone can help plz?
OA is D
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
CR question
This topic has expert replies
-
bblast
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:44 am
- Thanked: 118 times
- Followed by:33 members
- GMAT Score:710
this is an example of cause and effect reasoning :
to attack such question look for the opposite answer(if u are asked to weaken), or look to see if the author mistook the relation between the 2 things happnening.
However, in this case u need to strengthen the reasoning so go as below :
here the author says : students who receive full scholarships tend to maintain higher grade point
conclusion : scholarships enable students to achieve high grade point averages
see option D: High grade point averages were not the primary criterion upon which the scholarship awards were based
this implies that every student was equally likely to receive a scholarship ,
hence D.
or in other words :
there were some other criterion for scholarship. (And thus scholarship>>>led to>>>higher grades and not the opposite)
this question is a bit tricky however u can easily get rid of options a,b and E.
to attack such question look for the opposite answer(if u are asked to weaken), or look to see if the author mistook the relation between the 2 things happnening.
However, in this case u need to strengthen the reasoning so go as below :
here the author says : students who receive full scholarships tend to maintain higher grade point
conclusion : scholarships enable students to achieve high grade point averages
see option D: High grade point averages were not the primary criterion upon which the scholarship awards were based
this implies that every student was equally likely to receive a scholarship ,
hence D.
or in other words :
there were some other criterion for scholarship. (And thus scholarship>>>led to>>>higher grades and not the opposite)
this question is a bit tricky however u can easily get rid of options a,b and E.
Last edited by bblast on Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers !!
Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40
My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40
My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
-
stormier
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 4:45 pm
- Location: Boston
- Thanked: 20 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:720
Derek1988 wrote:A recent university study indicated that students who receive full scholarships tend to maintain higher grade point averages than do students who must take out loans or work to finance school. The study concluded that scholarships enable students to achieve high grade point averages by alleviating the stress related to financial concerns and freeing up students' time to study more.
The study's conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?
The basic rule of assumption question -> if the assumption is negated (or reversed) the argument should fall apart.
(A)Students who take out loans maintain higher grade point averages than those who work to finance school.
Incorrect. The argument is about comparison between the Students receiving full scholarships and students who either take loans or work for their tuition. It is not about comparison among the students who finance their loans in different ways (loan vs work).
(B)Finance-related stress affects student performance in a manner similar to that of restricted study time.
Incorrect. This is a tricky choice. One may think that reduced study time would mean lower grades for students who are stressed. Let's try and negate this and say - finance-relate stress does not affect student performance in a manner similar to that of restricted study time. Would the argument fall apart ? The answer is no. Finance related stress may affect the student performance in other manners, such as lower concentration (not neccessarily reduced study time)
(C)Students who must work to pay for their studies cannot maintain high grade point averages.
Incorrect. Its vague. What's high GPA ? the argument is about comparison - that of highER GPA of scholarship students.
(D)High grade point averages were not the primary criterion upon which the scholarship awards were based.
Correct. Let's negate this one to say that - Scholarships were awarded based on high GPA - meaning students who already had higher GPAs received scholarships, and hence the pre-existing high GPAs caused them to receive the scholarship. The scholarships did not cause them to receive higher grades. The argument falls apart. Thus correct.
(E)Controlling stress level is less important to student performance than is intensive studying.
Incorrect. Again negate it - What if controlling stress level is more important to student perfromance than intensive studying ? The argument can still hold.
Anyone can help plz?
OA is D
