BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR question

Expert replies
by jamesk486 » Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:47 pm
Under the agricultural policies of Country R, farmers can sell any grain not sold on the open market to a grain board at guaranteed prices. It seems inevitable that, in order to curb the resultant escalating overproduction, the grain board will in just a few years have to impose quaotas on grain production, limiting farmers to a certain flat percentage of the grain acreage they cultivated previously.
Suppose an individual farmer in country R wishes to minimize the impact on profits of the grain quota whose eventual imposition is being predidcted. If the farmer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the farmer do now?
(A) Select in advance currently less profitable grain fields and retire them if the quota takes effect.
(B) Seek long-term contracts to sell grain at a fixed price
(C) Replace obsolete tractors with more efficient new ones
(D) Put marginal land under cultivation and grow grain on it
(E) Agree with other farmers on voluntary cutbacks in grain production

help! all the answers look so tempting
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: CR question

by nitin86 » Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:58 pm
jamesk486 wrote:Under the agricultural policies of Country R, farmers can sell any grain not sold on the open market to a grain board at guaranteed prices. It seems inevitable that, in order to curb the resultant escalating overproduction, the grain board will in just a few years have to impose quaotas on grain production, limiting farmers to a certain flat percentage of the grain acreage they cultivated previously.
Suppose an individual farmer in country R wishes to minimize the impact on profits of the grain quota whose eventual imposition is being predidcted. If the farmer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the farmer do now?
(A) Select in advance currently less profitable grain fields and retire them if the quota takes effect.
(B) Seek long-term contracts to sell grain at a fixed price
(C) Replace obsolete tractors with more efficient new ones
(D) Put marginal land under cultivation and grow grain on it
(E) Agree with other farmers on voluntary cutbacks in grain production

help! all the answers look so tempting
IMO A
as, in this case though the land he is acquiring is less profitable, but he can sell that extra grain to the board, and make money. Further, when the acreage is to be reduced, this land can be sold.

B - does not guarantee the amount to be purchased

C - out of scope

D - marginal land will not get profits

E- don't know why its wrong, but it doesn't provide a solution
Join the discussion

by airan » Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:09 pm
How can a land which is less profitable produce extra grain ?
I think it should be D with some assumption of common sense ..
btw ..what is OA ?
Thanks
Airan
Join the discussion

by nitin86 » Sat Jun 14, 2008 7:47 am
airan wrote:How can a land which is less profitable produce extra grain ?
I think it should be D with some assumption of common sense ..
btw ..what is OA ?
Dictionary meaning of "Marginal" -> Producing at a rate that barely covers production costs

Therefore, D can't be correct
Join the discussion

by umaa » Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:36 am
I believe "A" is the answer.

A - As an individual formar, he can do this.

B - Not gauranteed and need others support

C - No chance

D - Not possible; Mentioned as "Marginal land"

E - Need others support.
Join the discussion

by sulabh » Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:00 am
I think the answer is A.Under the new quota system,a farmer will be allowed to cultivate a fixed percentage of his land.So if a farmer identifies the land with less producivity,he can give up production in that part and minimize the effect on his profit.
Join the discussion

by netigen » Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:39 am
Ans is D

Focus on the conclusion.

in order to curb the resultant escalating overproduction, the grain board will in just a few years have to impose quotas on grain production, limiting farmers to a certain flat percentage of the grain acreage they cultivated previously.

If the farmer can increase the acreage that he cultivates today then after the quote the % of land under cultivation will be higher. More land under cultivation more profits.
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 12:13 am
I still feel D should be the answer.
Join the discussion