your picture is too small not able to read it properly..
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
CR Q
Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning |
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------
EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
[email protected]
-------------------------
EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
IMO A
Only this option seems to weaken the conclusion "Poor scientific work is.... not harmful". C I have no idea but does not seem right.
Only this option seems to weaken the conclusion "Poor scientific work is.... not harmful". C I have no idea but does not seem right.
Dear Prasad bhai,
I will go with 'B'. It provides an alternate reason for the conclusion.
I will go with 'B'. It provides an alternate reason for the conclusion.
I will go with A
Argument: There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmend before publication.
The statement which strengthen this argument (or a strong basis for this argument) is :
replication of results by other scientists . The last line of the para also talk similar thing as well abt time of replication
Argument: There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmend before publication.
The statement which strengthen this argument (or a strong basis for this argument) is :
replication of results by other scientists . The last line of the para also talk similar thing as well abt time of replication
IMO option A is the one which can weaken the conclusion - 'No reason to why Scientist's work should be officially confirmed...'
So option A states one reason as to why it is neccessary to scientist's work needs to be challenged/confirmed.
please post the OA.
So option A states one reason as to why it is neccessary to scientist's work needs to be challenged/confirmed.
please post the OA.
Thanks
Puneet
Puneet













