BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR - Princeton, not satisfied with OA, please discuss

Expert replies
by reply2spg » Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:18 pm
A small country, Country S, has instituted a hefty tax on imported electronics in an attempt to protect the largest company and employer in the country. As a result of this import tax, the national electronics company is now able to compete in the electronics market.

Which of the following can be inferred from the information above?


Only small quantities of electronics from companies outside of Country S will now be sold in Country S.

To take further advantage of the import tax, the national electronics company will expand its product line.

Electronics have become more expensive to import not only due to the added import taxes but also due to increased transportation costs.

Electronics are cheaper to produce outside Country S than inside Country S.

The national electronics company not only sells electronics products in Country S but also exports them to Country T and Country U.

OA D. However, how is it inferred? Which sentence talks about OA?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Phirozz » Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:27 pm
reply2spg wrote:A small country, Country S, has instituted a hefty tax on imported electronics in an attempt to protect the largest company and employer in the country. As a result of this import tax, the national electronics company is now able to compete in the electronics market.

Which of the following can be inferred from the information above?


Only small quantities of electronics from companies outside of Country S will now be sold in Country S.

To take further advantage of the import tax, the national electronics company will expand its product line.

Electronics have become more expensive to import not only due to the added import taxes but also due to increased transportation costs.

Electronics are cheaper to produce outside Country S than inside Country S.

The national electronics company not only sells electronics products in Country S but also exports them to Country T and Country U.

OA D. However, how is it inferred? Which sentence talks about OA?
A. As per the psg, local companies will be able to compete in the market, but we cannot say that less imported goods ll be sold. A is out
B. It is irrelevant, nothing can be infered about expansion plan
C. Out of scope, talking about transportation cost
D. Its the answer because In country S, cost of production is high so sales price also high. Since the import price is low compared to the price in country S, it can be inferred that its cheaper to produce in other countries.
E. Its again irrelevant, talking about country T and U which is not mentioned in psg.

D can be rejected on the ground that even if cost of production is high in other countries, their govt provide export subsidy so the import price in country S becomes lower. Since other four options are clearly out of scope, D can be inferred.
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:10 am
Lets analyze the stimulus first .

Country S is producing electronics good and also importing electronics . However country S institute hefty tax on import and as a result national electronic company is able to compete in the market.

Now if we look closely the sentence says COMPETE and compete dose not mean national electronics company is now selling its products and holds an equal market share .

The other thing to note is that even after the hefty tax the imported goods still sell and national electronics is only competing and not exceeding its market share.

So there must be some reason why still the companies in country S only can compete with outsiders and not defeat them , lets look at the answers :

(A)Only small quantities of electronics from companies outside of Country S will now be sold in Country S.

[May be true may be not nothing in the premise says this will be true , more importantly dose not give reason to our question. eliminate]

(B)To take further advantage of the import tax, the national electronics company will expand its product line.
[Again extra information given and nothing in the premise states this to be true. Eliminate]

(C)Electronics have become more expensive to import not only due to the added import taxes but also due to increased transportation costs.
[The tax part is ok , but there is no mention of transport cost and again extra info . Eliminate]

Electronics are cheaper to produce outside Country S than inside Country S.
[Now if we put this reason into our question makes sense and more importantly agrees with the information provided in the premise . Correct ]

The national electronics company not only sells electronics products in Country S but also exports them to Country T and Country U.
[extra information , nothing said about exporting products. Eliminate]


So even if you can not infer the correct answer , just by eliminating the options that provide added information you can get the to the correct answer.
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Sun Mar 07, 2010 5:06 am
reply2spg wrote: sometimes eliminations helps


Only small quantities of electronics from companies outside of Country S will now be sold in Country S.
quantity is not at all covered by stimulus...eliminate

To take further advantage of the import tax, the national electronics company will expand its product line.
not at all discussed it might be true but its way out of stimulus

Electronics have become more expensive to import not only due to the added import taxes but also due to increased transportation costs.
transportation costs is not discussed.........eliminate

Electronics are cheaper to produce outside Country S than inside Country S.


The national electronics company not only sells electronics products in Country S but also exports them to Country T and Country U.
contryT and U out of scope.....
only D remains

OA D. However, how is it inferred? Which sentence talks about OA?
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 11:52 pm
I will Go with option D in this case.
Join the discussion