BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR Practice test question #2

Expert replies
by missionmba » Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:19 pm
A company that manufactures heavy industrial equipment employs dozens of people in jobs that are considered quite hazardous. The company obeys federal regulations governing workplace safety, and, to comply with new regulations instituted to avoid recently discovered risks from airborne particulate matter, company engineers were required to install extremely expensive air filtering equipment. However, despite the expense of the air filtering equipment, the company's operating costs for the quarter were considerably lower than normal.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent paradox?


Over half the company's expenditures to maintain worker safety go to pay for protective garments; yet only a small percentage of such expenditures go to pay for nose and mouth filters.

Prior to the installation of the air filtering equipment, the company had had to prevent damage due to particulate contamination of manufacturing equipment.

The company's costs of labor, which make up a large fraction of operating costs, increased during the same period.

When the air filtering equipment was installed in the manufacturing facility, the company took the opportunity to upgrade the temperature control equipment.

The majority of the company's employees work in the areas of the plant in which the air filtering equipment was installed.
Mission Mba

Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sibbineni » Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:34 pm
IMO B
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:00 pm
IMO A
Join the discussion

by gmattester » Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:34 pm
IMO 'B'
Join the discussion

by missionmba » Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:35 am
OA : B

Resolve the paradox: how can operating costs be lower when the new equipment is so expensive?

A> This is out of scope: we are concerned with air-filtering equipment, not garments or facial filters.

B> Here, we are given an explanation of how operating costs could go down (the shutdown, with its maintenance costs, is eliminated) even as the new equipment is present. The equipment actually prevents additional costs.

C> This tells us how operating costs went up, not how they went down.

D> This answer choice tells us about how operating costs went up, not how they went down.

E> Though this answer choice does tell us some detail about the new equipment, it doesn’t tell us how operating costs could have gone down.
Mission Mba

Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 2:05 am
Looking at it now,B makes sense
Join the discussion