BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR Practice test question #11

Expert replies
by missionmba » Tue Aug 05, 2008 4:16 am
Party leaders feared that the recent addition of conservative planks to the party platform would diminish the popularity of the party among younger voters. Some predicted that the number of party members younger than 25 would decline, or, at best, stay the same. This fear, though, has proven to be unfounded: of all party members, the percentage younger than 25 is higher than ever. Rather than hurt the party, conservatism has helped attract more young voters to the party.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the author’s conclusion?


Many party leaders are uncomfortable with the political direction the party is taking, for both political and ideological reasons.

Party candidates continue to suffer defeats when running on the party platform.

The number of party members older than 25 declined significantly after the announcement of the new conservative platform.

In the last election, the ratio of voters under the age of 25 who voted for the party to all voters under the age of 25 increased.

Over half the population of potential voters under the age of 25 never vote.
Mission Mba

Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by raunekk » Tue Aug 05, 2008 6:52 am
imo:C
Join the discussion

by yingli » Wed Aug 06, 2008 2:16 pm
IMO C
Join the discussion

Re: CR Practice test question #11

by Stockmoose16 » Fri Aug 08, 2008 4:14 pm
missionmba wrote:Party leaders feared that the recent addition of conservative planks to the party platform would diminish the popularity of the party among younger voters. Some predicted that the number of party members younger than 25 would decline, or, at best, stay the same. This fear, though, has proven to be unfounded: of all party members, the percentage younger than 25 is higher than ever. Rather than hurt the party, conservatism has helped attract more young voters to the party.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the author’s conclusion?


Many party leaders are uncomfortable with the political direction the party is taking, for both political and ideological reasons.

Party candidates continue to suffer defeats when running on the party platform.

The number of party members older than 25 declined significantly after the announcement of the new conservative platform.

In the last election, the ratio of voters under the age of 25 who voted for the party to all voters under the age of 25 increased.

Over half the population of potential voters under the age of 25 never vote.
There is no way "C" is correct. The conclusion of the paragraph is "Rather than hurt the party, conservatism has helped attract more young voters."

C says, "The number of party members older than 25 declined significantly after the announcement of the new conservative platform." Remember that the paragraph's conclusion said conservatism helped attract more young voters. It said nothing about the declination of over 25 voters.

What's the OA?
Join the discussion

Re: CR Practice test question #11

by Ian Stewart » Fri Aug 08, 2008 4:53 pm
Stockmoose16 wrote: There is no way "C" is correct. The conclusion of the paragraph is "Rather than hurt the party, conservatism has helped attract more young voters."

C says, "The number of party members older than 25 declined significantly after the announcement of the new conservative platform." Remember that the paragraph's conclusion said conservatism helped attract more young voters. It said nothing about the declination of over 25 voters.

What's the OA?
It's certainly C. This is a math (ratio) question disguised as a CR question. The conclusion, that young voters were attracted to the party, is based on the fact, as stated in the argument, that young voters now make up a larger percentage of party members than before. This might mean that young people joined the party, but it might also mean that old people left the party. Knowing that 25-and-unders now make up a greater percentage of party members than before does not mean that there are more 25-and-unders in the party than before, which is what the argument claims.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by missionmba » Sun Aug 10, 2008 2:29 am
OA: C

:)
Mission Mba

Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 1:47 am
I think C is the right answer here.
Join the discussion