BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR Practice test question #1

Expert replies
by missionmba » Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:32 am
The management of a magazine recently divided its staff of writers into two groups based on whether the writers took more than six breaks daily. A higher percentage of those writers who took more than six breaks a day had problems producing article ideas than did the writers who took six breaks or fewer. The management of the magazine concluded that taking more than six breaks per day causes writers to be less productive.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?


The writers who took more than six breaks daily produced, on average, more articles than did the other writers who took less than six breaks daily.

Some of the writers who took fewer than six breaks daily produced large numbers
of article ideas.

A diminished output of article ideas was the reason that some of the writers who
took fewer than six breaks daily lowered the amount of breaks that they took per day.

Some writers took breaks of only one minute each, while other writers took breaks
of up to twenty minutes each.

Frustration over the low production of article ideas caused some of the writers already taking more than six breaks a day to take even more frequent breaks.
Mission Mba

Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by raunekk » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:14 am
IMO:C
Join the discussion

Answer

by amitk7771 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 6:48 am
Answer is E, cause effect relationship reversed ?
Join the discussion

by sibbineni » Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:26 am
IMO C
Join the discussion

by iwill » Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:05 am
IMO E.Please post the OA
Join the discussion

by missionmba » Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:13 am
OA: A.

My answer was C.

1> This indicates that although the frequent break takers produce fewer ideas, they are actually more productive. Correct

2>This does not weaken the conclusion, since this information is consistent with what is given in the argument.

3> This answer has no impact on the argument that taking more than six breaks causes writers to be less productive. It is possible that both this answer and the argument are true and valid.

4> The length of the breaks is not relevant to the argument.

5> This talks about differences within the group of frequent break-takers.
Mission Mba

Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 6:53 pm
I dont agree with A because it is trying to change what the question says.
I think E and C are serious contenders and i would pick E

Passage says : more than 6 breaks causes diminished idea
Option C says : diminished idea was caused by ppl to take fewer than 6 breaks..

Option C does not seem to weaken the conclusion.
Join the discussion

by missionmba » Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:24 am
this que was on one of my online tests(PR).
According to them answer is A

:(
Mission Mba

Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 2:05 am
Guys can anyone give a decent reason why A is not right.
Join the discussion